On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 05:18:29PM -0500, Nathan Hawkins wrote: > Also, I'd like to point out to you that when this started, none of the > people involved had any real experience with porting Debian. So that > learning curve, plus RL demands on our time, had a lot to do with the > time it took to accomplish anything. Anyway, I seem to recall that the > critical part of my work on the native libc port got done in about 2-3 > months.
I recall having participated in both ports years ago. I do also recall seeing GNU/*BSD systems with *BSD libc based on _slink_. Seems obvious that progress is very slow with *BSD libc's. > > And I have seen your "less work" patches already. Xfree86 and pam are good > > examples. Have a look at them. > > We fixed pam to run on native libc a long time ago. It wasn't that bad, > once I got libshadow written. And last I knew you didn't have an X > server package, which I had on the native libc a long time ago. I was referring to the GNU/NetBSD port. See bug #201683 for example, and compare it to the one-liner patch I sent to pam. As for Xfree86, try "wc -l debian/patches/84*" in the source tree. Just a pair of examples. (btw, fixing the X server is on my todo) -- Robert Millan "[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new work." -- J.R.R.T, Ainulindale (Silmarillion)