On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 08:27:58AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 01:18:34PM +0200, Momchil Velikov wrote: > > I thought you were genuinely interested in solving this "issue". > > Isn't it in the interest of the members of the list to take part in > > ONE ballot, having ALL sensible suggestions to choose? Frankly, your > > refusal to include the option suggested by me looks dangerously close > > to an attempt to influence the decision, by proposing courses of > > action in concent with your own preferences. > > It's extremely dangerous: I almost snorted water onto my keyboard. > > But I think his point was: that one email that had the straw poll in it. > And, barring some kind of extremely effective time travel, it was too > late to add more options to that particular straw poll.
Not precisely; you'll note two follow-up emails (so far) that have updated
the poll. The option he wants added isn't part of the question I was trying
to ask, however.
> To send out another straw poll, you, he, or the designated pollster
> would have to find somebody capable of sending email and get their help.
I certainly have no objection to the question "should we deal with this at
all" being asked, but I think it's proper place is on debian-legal, not
debian-bsd, given what it deals with.
--
Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ,''`.
Debian GNU/NetBSD(i386) porter : :' :
`. `'
`-
pgptc0Vc6gVx4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
