Your message dated Fri, 18 Nov 2005 13:19:41 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line rebuild of glibc-2.3.0 for kfreeBSD (packages to test)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Oct 2005 18:31:14 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 30 10:31:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.t-systems.cz [212.67.76.249]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EWHxa-0000m3-00; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 10:31:14 -0800
Received: from mefisto.t-systems.cz (faust.t-systems.cz [10.246.110.12])
by mail.t-systems.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97CAA899E3
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 19:31:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: from enigma ([10.246.109.32]) by mefisto.t-systems.cz with Microsoft
SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
Sun, 30 Oct 2005 19:31:09 +0100
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 19:31:08 +0100 (CET)
From: Petr Salinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: kfreebsd-5: please leave page zero unmapped
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Oct 2005 18:31:09.0413 (UTC)
FILETIME=[18F41950:01C5DD80]
X-T-Systems_Czech-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-T-Systems_Czech-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted),
SpamAssassin (score=-4.806, required 5, autolearn=not spam,
ALL_TRUSTED -3.30, AWL 1.09, BAYES_00 -2.60)
X-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: kfreebsd-5
Hi.
ELF loader /lib/ld.so.1 is mapped in memory at address 0.
$ cat /proc/self/maps
00000000-00012000 r-xp 00016000 00:00 94246 /lib/ld-2.3.so
00012000-00013000 rw-p 00001000 00:00 0
08048000-0804c000 r-xp 00004000 00:00 94294 /bin/cat
0804c000-0804d000 rw-p 00002000 00:00 0
0804d000-0804e000 rwxp 00002000 00:00 0
2804c000-2804d000 rwxp 00001000 00:00 0
2804d000-28057000 r-xp 0000a000 00:00 73652 /etc/ld.so.cache
28057000-28160000 r-xp 0010e000 00:00 94249 /lib/libc-2.3.so
28160000-28164000 rwxp 0010e000 00:00 94249 /lib/libc-2.3.so
28164000-28168000 rwxp 00004000 00:00 0
bfbe0000-bfc00000 rwxp 00020000 00:00 0
Therefore reading of NULL pointers is not caught.
I don't know where is decided base adress for /lib/ld.so.1.
Thanks
Petr
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 336496-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Nov 2005 12:19:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 18 04:19:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from [62.57.140.216] (helo=khazad.dyndns.org)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ed5Co-0007J7-3c
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 04:19:02 -0800
Received: from rmh by khazad.dyndns.org with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1Ed5DR-0004MG-MJ; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 13:19:41 +0100
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 13:19:41 +0100
From: Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Glibc/k*BSD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: rebuild of glibc-2.3.0 for kfreeBSD (packages to test)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organisation: free as in freedom
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
This closes #336496, I'm CCing -done.
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 10:07:36AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have spent the night on the glibc packages and, thanks to Petr
> Salinger we provide me the patches, we now have new packages of the
> glibc 2.3. Tests packages are available from:
>
> http://io.debian.net/~aurel32/glibc
>
> They mainly fix problem of ET_DYN/ET_EXEC so that we could now get rid
> of the ugly patch in binutils, the fact that ld.so was mapped at
> 0x00000000, rpcgen which is now compatible with gcc-4.0, the sys_errlist
> symbol which was not available, plus some minor fixes.
>
> If you could, please test these packages. Note that you need a kernel
> 5.4 (which supports ET_DYN and ET_EXEC linker).
>
> If everything is ok, I will upload it soon.
>
> Aurelien
>
> --
> .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
> : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
> `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> Glibc-bsd-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/glibc-bsd-devel
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
