Cyril Brulebois a écrit : > Petr Salinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (21/06/2006): >> The current version fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD due to unsatisfied >> build-dependency on sysutils. >> >> But sysutils are not needed for building. Please, could you just drop >> it. > > Hi, > > we had no news about this bugreport, is there anything wrong with > dropping this extra B-D? > > I'm thinking about a porter NMU since this package has many reverse > dependencies, at least by lowering this B-D with a "[!kfreebsd-i386 > !kfreebsd-amd64]" (and maybe "!hurd-i386" also, I'm asking GNU/Hurd > porters), so that nothing at all changes for Linux. > > Thanks for considering to do this tiny modification in a Maintainer > Upload or to allow us (GNU/kFreeBSD porters) to NMU it.
I have just uploaded a fixed package to unreleased for kfreebsd-i386. The kfreebsd-amd64 package is also ready, I will upload it after the next install run. If we don't have any news in let's say two weeks, I think we can go for a porter NMU. Bye, Aurelien -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
