On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:19:27AM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Aurelien Jarno dixit: > > >enabled ext2 support. Both have incompatible licenses (GPL v2 vs CDDL), > >so that would mean disabling ext2 support. Any comments? > > I wonder why FreeBSD ext2fs code is GPL'd. Other BSDs have a UFS-based > implementation under BSD licence. (It's slow though.) >
I don't know why, but a grep GPL conf/files is really explict: conf/files: warning "kernel contains GPL contaminated csaimg.h header" conf/files: warning "kernel contains GPL contaminated emu10k1 headers" conf/files: warning "kernel contains GPL contaminated emu10kx headers" conf/files: warning "kernel contains GPL contaminated emu10kx headers" conf/files: warning "kernel contains GPL contaminated emu10kx headers" conf/files: warning "kernel contains GPL contaminated maestro3 headers" conf/files: warning "kernel contains GPL contaminated ext2fs filesystem" conf/files: warning "kernel contains GPL contaminated ReiserFS filesystem" conf/files: warning "kernel contains GPL contaminated xfs filesystem" sys/gnu/fs/ext2fs/COPYRIGHT.INFO contains more details about ext2fs support license. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
