Petr Salinger a écrit : >> But in fact, the HAVE_INLINED_SYSCALLS currently >> means only HAVE_INTERNAL_SYSCALLS ... >> >>> The calls to INLINE_SYSCALL is not the part that worries me the most. It's >>> rather the code between #ifdef HAVE_INLINED_SYSCALLS in the elf/ >>> directory. Not something we can workaround easily from our >>> ports/sysdeps/directory. >> I would suggest declare HAVE_INLINED_SYSCALLS, but keep current >> "#define INLINE_SYSCALL(name, nr, args...) __syscall_##name (args)" >> >> and only provide INTERNAL_SYSCALL as >> #define INTERNAL_SYSCALL(name, err, nr, args...) >> INTERNAL_SYSCALL_##name(err, >> args...) >> >> Currently there is only one needed - INTERNAL_SYSCALL_writev due to >> dl-misc.c: INTERNAL_SYSCALL (writev, err, 3, fd, &iov, niov) > > I have done it, in fact there is a need for two macros: > > INTERNAL_SYSCALL_close(name, err, nr, fd) > INTERNAL_SYSCALL_writev(name, err, nr, fd, iov, cnt) > > Testsuite is OK, code is in glibc-bsd and pkg-glibc SVNs. >
Thanks, that will do it for now. However I still think we should plan using real inline syscalls sooner or later to avoid future problems like this one, but at least now we have a bit of time. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 [email protected] http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
