"John H. Robinson, IV" <[email protected]> writes: > Russ Allbery wrote:
>> My understanding is that part (although certainly not all) of the >> reason behind the default change is consistency with the kfreebsd >> architectures which are expected to be part of Debian. Debian has >> needed to adapt to BSD behavior, non-standard or not, since the project >> decided to include the kfreebsd architectures. That's part of porting. > What is wrong with porting kfreebsd behaivour instead? I don't know. What do the BSD porters think about it? -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
