Le Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:34:03PM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski a écrit : > > Because nobody on kfreebsd list was interested, and I myself is not > interested in that architecture, I decided to limit the ARCHs by only > those supported by fuse-utils. Respectively, I amended the > Architecture: line in the debian/control of my package. Then, my > sponsor uploaded it to unstable. However, because there had been > already a version of my package in testing (sucessfully built on > kfreebsd-*) [as I wrote, it got there because originally my package > did not have a dependency on fuse-utils, that was, strictly speaking, > a bug on linux that I recently attempted to correct], I suspect that > this upload would not be enough to let the new version of the package > propagate into testing. Please correct me if I am wrong. If not, > please let me know what to do in this situation.
Dear Stanislav, you need to request the removal of the kfreebsd version in unstable. http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
