Robert Millan wrote: > Given that: > - gdm3 is now in a working state for Debian GNU/kFreeBSD > - gdm isn't
Just wondering, what you consider a "working state". With the exception of http://bugs.debian.org/586539, gdm works fine here on kfreebsd-i386. And that bug is very probably no gdm-specific issue as it happens with kdm as well, see http://bugs.debian.org/586540 (reported together with 586539). I don't see any other kfreebsd-specific bug-report on http://bugs.debian.org/gdm nor do I have any other issues with gdm on kfreebsd. > I'd recommend removing kfreebsd-{i386,amd64} gdm binaries > from testing and then forgetting about this problem. Since we still have to fix the same issue for kdm anyway, I think it's a bad idea to take #586539 as a reason to remove gdm from kfreebsd. If we can fix it for kdm, but the fix doesn't fix gdm, too, or can't be applied to gdm, too, _then_ we can talk about removal, but IMHO not now. Or we should talk about the removal of kdm, too. But there's no (KDE-) alternative for that currently. Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <[email protected]>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE `- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
