Petr Salinger <[email protected]> writes: >>> There is no way, signal is determined by eglibc compiled for. >>> Lets assume that your binary is compiled under squeeze. >>> Under squeeze eglibc, it will receive SIGBUS, >>> under sid eglibc it will receive SIGSEGV. >> >> I don't understand this part. Your first sentence seems to say the >> signal is determined by the build environment, but the next part seems >> to contradict that. Is this just a wording problem (the first sentence >> missing a not?) or something more subtle? > > Build environment of used eglibc (MIN_KERNEL_SUPPORTED), > but not build environment of your binary.
Plain FreeBSD has a getosreldate here (as I read sbcl source[0]) right?
Maybe that could be added so this test can be kept uniformly?
Regards
Christoph
[0] jep sbcl started to FTBFS for that reason .. I'm now building a
fixed package
--
9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731
Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
pgpCXhQaBwBEQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
