Wiadomość napisana przez Mats Erik Andersson w dniu 2011-06-10, o godz. 02:10: > tisdag den 7 juni 2011 klockan 21:31 skrev Guillem Jover detta: >> On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 21:24:02 +0200, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: >>> >>> Yes, I can have a go at it. In passing by, I agree with Robert that >>> the executables should be built from 'freebsd-utils'. That was the >>> solution that Petr indicated to me at the time of importing the initial >>> adaption into the Alioth project. >> >> Ah yes, had forgotten too that conversation, then let me merge it and >> then feel free to update freebsd-utils copyright file, this way if >> there's dupes it avoids adding them. > > I have committed an incomplete survey to > > trunk/freebsd-quota/debian/copyright > > thus postponing the decision of a murge until I proceed further. > This intermediary state can serve us as evolutionary documentation, > if nothing else! > > The really cumbersome point is 'sbin/fsck_ffs/*' where 4-claused, > 3-claused, and 2-claused BSD licensing is mixed on individual > files, dependent on the contributing authors. At the moment > I have detected all names with attributed copyright, but the > finer points of splitting and text inclusion will be done > step wise. Any advice on practice is most welcome. Also DEP-3 > does have its drawbacks.
Perhaps I'm looking at different set of sources, but the FreeBSD version does not seem to contain any four-clause BSD license - there is no advertising clause there. -- If you cut off my head, what would I say? Me and my head, or me and my body? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
