2011/10/16 Jonathan Nieder <[email protected]>: > More importantly, there is the question you raised of whether this > should be done in userspace by libc instead. That would avoid > upstream having to wonder, "why should we care what happens when > someone using a BSD4.3-style bind() calls our BSD4.4-style kernel"? > So it's tempting.
I guess upstream would appreciate if we get rid of the length limit. It sets the maximum path length for sockets to 104 chars, is that so? -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOfDtXPOth=5neQ6JKeerfCSH0ju+-ez=6tgrftoc8dmm4e...@mail.gmail.com
