On 18/12/11 02:22, Robert Millan wrote: > Unless upstream can be persuaded to take a different direction, my > only suggestion is to make gnome-shell a Linux-only package by setting > its Architecture field to "linux-any".
Hi, I've been unable to build libnm-util without Linux Wireless Extensions; it seems to be needed in a few places other than the wireless and wireless-security components. Maybe upstream could add a configure option and ifdefs to still be able to build it without certain features. The (unofficial?) gnome3 FreeBSD porting effort decided it was easier to just remove network-manager from gnome-shell: * http://www.marcuscom.com:8080/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/ports/x11/gnome-shell/files/patch-js_ui_main.js?rev=1.1&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup * http://www.marcuscom.com:8080/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/ports/x11/gnome-shell/files/patch-js_ui_networkAgent.js?rev=1.1&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup * http://www.marcuscom.com:8080/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/ports/x11/gnome-shell/files/patch-js_ui_panel.js?rev=1.1&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup But it sounds like gnome-shell on FreeBSD is still unstable for other reasons too. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4eed5380.6030...@pyro.eu.org
