On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 08:24:30PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > 2012/4/22 Robert Millan <r...@debian.org>: > > I notice that my initial patch didn't handle the library dependency > > part. I'm attaching a new patch that fixes this issue. This makes new > > packages built against the patched libc0.1-dev depend on libc0.1 >= > > 2.13-31. > > > > ****VERY IMPORTANT NOTICE****: if this patch is introduced in a later > > version (rather than 2.13-31), you MUST change the version in > > debian/libc0.1.symbols.common to the first version that provides > > pthread_condattr_*etclock on GNU/kFreeBSD. > > Uhm, I notice you didn't include this part. Now packages that build > with libc0.1-dev 2.13-31 won't have a versioned dependency on libc0.1 > >= 2.13-31. > > Are you sure this is correct? It seems to me that this can be a big > problem if those packages migrate to testing before eglibc does. >
Not it's a mistake, I don't know how I managed that. I am going to fix that in an upload today. Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120501103310.gk22...@hall.aurel32.net
