On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 13:05:28 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 22:51:11 +0000, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > > Using Debian Code Search we can see other cases where possibly the same > > mistake has been made - I wonder if any of these would cause bugs: > > > > http://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=fcntl.*F_SETFL.*FD_
This might still miss flags set through a variable. > I think we should report all these, there does not seem to be many in > any case: 9base (#696247) cctools (#696249) chromium-browser (webkit, #696299) e17 (#696276) fish (false positive) freeradius (#696250) gst-plugins-bad0.10 (#696278) jruby (#696283) libowfat (#696251) mswatch (#696252) ocamlnet (#696279) qt4-x11 (webkit, #696297) qtwebkit (webkit, #696296) ruby1.8 (#696280) ruby1.9.1 (#696281) webkit (#696295) And can be tracked with: <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=fcntl-fd-cloexec;users=debian-bsd@lists.debian.org> > Providing patches for those should also be trivial. I'll start doing > so if no one else offers for the task. :) So, just went ahead and did it. Thanks, Guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121219021702.ga2...@gaara.hadrons.org