On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 13:05:28 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 22:51:11 +0000, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> > Using Debian Code Search we can see other cases where possibly the same
> > mistake has been made - I wonder if any of these would cause bugs:
> > 
> > http://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=fcntl.*F_SETFL.*FD_

This might still miss flags set through a variable.

> I think we should report all these, there does not seem to be many in
> any case:

   9base (#696247)
   cctools (#696249)
   chromium-browser (webkit, #696299)
   e17 (#696276)
   fish (false positive)
   freeradius (#696250)
   gst-plugins-bad0.10 (#696278)
   jruby (#696283)
   libowfat (#696251)
   mswatch (#696252)
   ocamlnet (#696279)
   qt4-x11 (webkit, #696297)
   qtwebkit (webkit, #696296)
   ruby1.8 (#696280)
   ruby1.9.1 (#696281)
   webkit (#696295)

And can be tracked with:

  
<http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=fcntl-fd-cloexec;users=debian-bsd@lists.debian.org>

> Providing patches for those should also be trivial. I'll start doing
> so if no one else offers for the task. :)

So, just went ahead and did it.

Thanks,
Guillem


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121219021702.ga2...@gaara.hadrons.org

Reply via email to