2013/6/23 Steven Chamberlain <[email protected]>: > On 23/06/13 14:07, Robert Millan wrote: >> However if we do this, I would not mix Clang transition with 9.1 >> upgrade. Having two separate transitions makes it easier to isolate >> problems if/when they occur. > > Good point, but gcc-4.6 to gcc-4.8 would be a transition already? So > would you initially use gcc-4.6? The result should probably not be > allowed to migrate to jessie.
Are we going to transition to clang-3.2 or not? If we are, I don't see the point in going to gcc-4.8 first. Does anyone object to using clang-3.2 for kfreebsd-9? -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxmrasdc5hx1j5kq2o-shdyqfyw1t7hxhxr7__7ynlu...@mail.gmail.com
