Hi! On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 21:22:13 +0000, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > binary:libelf-freebsd-1 is NEW.
At least this one is a really bad idea, because even if it doesn't cause a file system conflict with the other libelf implementations they are a namespace conflict, due to using the exact same SONAME. This will cause unexpected loading of the wrong shared library when both libelf-freebsd-1 and libelf1 are installed at the same time. Also it will not allow for libelf-freebsd-1 to be moved to the multiarch paths, because that's what is currently preventing the file system conflict. Is this API incompatible with either of the other libelf implementations (libelf-dev, libelfg0-dev)? And if yes, would porting the code be much work? > binary:libdwarf3 is NEW. > binary:libdwarf3-dev is NEW. These are a namespace grab from the existing libdward-dev package. Thanks, Guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
