2013/7/17 Christoph Egger <[email protected]>: > Hm I'd probably skip 9.1 (or maybe put it into unstable > immediately). IMHO there's not much point in just finishing 9.1 to start > moving to 9.2 right away.
I like to have 9.1 so we can easily jump to it for testing purposes in case we find a bug somewhere in 9.2. This stage can be as short as 1 day, so it doesn't necessarily imply any delay :-) > and > having 9.1 would allow us to get some things started (like Intel KMS > drivers) that dfepend on a kernel > 9.0. Are you sure? I think the real work is in HEAD only, where the new DRM ABI is implemented (drm2 and i915kms). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOfDtXMQ1ELvEuCGh88hgef_auwNX+jdmnNhSSBUVrwLRSR=g...@mail.gmail.com
