Add me for armel. Bastien Le 2 oct. 2013 09:46, "Niels Thykier" <ni...@thykier.net> a écrit :
> Hi, > > The final results are in: > > Summary table: > Arch || DDs || NMs/DMs || Other || Total > ---------------++-----++---------++-------++------ > armel || 3 || 0 || 1 || 4 > armhf || 3 || 1 || 2 || 6 > hurd-i386 || 5 || 0 || 3 || 8 > ia64 || *0* || 0 || 3 || 3 > kfreebsd-amd64 || 4 || 0 || 2 || 6 > kfreebsd-i386 || 4 || 0 || 2 || 6 > mips || 1 || 0 || 1 || 2 > mipsel || 1 || 0 || 1 || 2 > powerpc[1] || (1) || 0 || 2 || 2.5? > s390x || *0* || 0 || 0 || *0* > sparc[2] || 1 || 0 || 0 || 1 > > [1] The (1) and .5 is from a "I am not primarily a porter [...]"-remark, > so I wasn't sure how to count it. > > [2] By the looks of it, if sparc was replaced by sparc64, we could be > looking at 3 in the "Other"-column rather than 0. > > NMs/DMs include DMs and people currently in NM process. The "Other" > column may include people who said they would like to become porters > (but would need to be introduced to the job) and thus may imply some > active recruiting from the current porters. This is at least true for > hurd-i386. > > > > The current policy says that we require "5 developers" (i.e. DDs) for > release architectures[AP], so based on that only amd64, i386 and > hurd-i386 would pass this requirement. It is quite possible we need to > revise that requirement, but most of the architectures would (still) do > well to attract a few more (DD) porters. > I have attached a file with my notes of who are behind those numbers. > If your name is missing or you believe I have miscounted something[CD] > for an architecture listed in the table above, please reply to this > email *promptly* (CC'ing me explicitly is fine) with your concerns or > corrections. > > At this time, I have *not* updated the arch qualification table yet. I > will do that in a couple of days. We will also follow up on this in the > next bits from the release team. > > ~Niels > > [AP] http://release.debian.org/jessie/arch_policy.html > > [CD] I may (or may not) have been caffeine-deprived when I did the > counting. You are free to make assumptions about whether that has > affected my ability to do addic^Htion or parsing your email(s) properly. > >
