On 28/02/14 17:58, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> > However, I will wait for a resolution from ftp-master before >> > resuming my work on the package, because there is the possibility >> > of ftp-master not allowing the upload and I don't like to waste my >> > time. > Just because your package is rejected doesn't mean you can't get it > into unstable at all. Packages are rejected all the time. It just > means the package is not *yet* fit for ACCEPT.
What I'm afraid of is ftp-masters rejecting the package for license issues (CDDL-GPL). If the ftp-masters reject the package on a license issue basis this would mean that zfs-linux won't get into Debian. So I rather will wait for this before resuming my work on the current package. I think the license isn't a problem at all because zfs-dkms only ships source code (no binary distributed). And the binary utilities distributed on zfsutils don't depend on any CDDL-incompatible library/package.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature