On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 01:19:52AM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 14/08/14 18:15, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > [...] If a
> > single extra udeb (or udeb size increase, which happens from time to
> > time) is going to break kfreebsd-*, it seems to me that their status
> > is far too brittle.
> The fixed-size d-i initrds had to be carefully sized for kfreebsd wheezy.
Please move d-i to an unfixed size filesystem. Even freebsd have some
sort of tmpfs.
> And/or we could maybe lose some unnecessary udebs. I mentioned
> partman-iscsi as an example to start with (I also didn't understand
> how/why that was being included in the image at all?) but there are
> probably other and larger candidates.
Sorry, not in this stage of the Jessie development.
Bastian
--
Only a fool fights in a burning house.
-- Kank the Klingon, "Day of the Dove", stardate unknown
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140820064719.ga10...@mail.waldi.eu.org
