On 22:06, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 22:43, Christoph Egger wrote:
> > Christoph Egger <[email protected]> writes:
> > > However fuse4bsd ships a mount_fusefs binary and carrys a dependency
> > > on kldutils so it may not be totally useless.
> > 
> > Though that could (and should?) be added to freebsd-utils.
> 
> Aha, we could move the binary there and Provides:/Conflicts:
> fuse4bsd from there too.  It might be useful to have it in a udeb
> someday.

For now, shall we keep the fuse4bsd source package, update it
for kfreebsd-10, and just stop building the fuse4bsd-dkms binary
package?

Regards,
-- 
Steven Chamberlain
[email protected]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]

Reply via email to