Yes well the bug is in the kfreebsd headers. I should have been more precise: the bug is no longer relevant to ITK. Perhaps I should have just reassigned to some other package.
On August 12, 2016 8:57:14 AM CDT, u...@debian.org wrote: >"Steve M. Robbins" <st...@sumost.ca> writes: > >> Bug #686402 is no longer relevant since ITK is not targeting >kfreebsd. > >Support for -std=c99 would still be good to have as a matter of >principle, and seems like it should be straightforward to implement. >I won't press the matter further, though. > >-- >Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) >http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | >http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?a...@monk.mit.edu -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
