Your message dated Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:45:58 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: This bug is in libflac4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jan 2005 01:53:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 05 17:53:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CmMph-0001Kb-00; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 17:53:01 -0800
Received: from rcm-200-220-132-60.nipnet.net.br (khazad-dum.debian.net)
[200.220.132.60]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CmMpg-0004f8-00; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:53:00 -0600
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by localhost.khazad-dum.debian.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F32320A633;
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:53:00 -0200 (BRST)
Received: from khazad-dum.debian.net ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (khazad-dum [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with LMTP id 06202-01; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:52:58 -0200 (BRST)
Received: by khazad-dum.debian.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id E76812002B2; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:52:58 -0200 (BRST)
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:52:58 -0200
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libflac4: wrong soname on binary package (should be libflac6)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.5
X-GPG-Fingerprint-1: 1024D/128D36EE 50AC 661A 7963 0BBA 8155 43D5 6EF7 F36B
128D 36EE
X-GPG-Fingerprint-2: 1024D/1CDB0FE3 5422 5C61 F6B7 06FB 7E04 3738 EE25 DE3F
1CDB 0FE3
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at khazad-dum.debian.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libflac4
Version: 1.1.1-1
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
Justification: renders package unusable
libFLAC 1.1.1 has soname 6. libflac4 should contain old libFLAC 1.0,
and be on section old-libs. libFLAC 1.1.1 should be in a libflac6 package.
I can atest that the soname change is necessary, I've been waiting for this
upload for a long time (to get proper seekable ogg-flac support routines for
TiMidity++...)
As it stands, this package breaks all packages that depend on libflac4.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.28-rc1-debian5+skas+lmsensors+3c59xvlan+lmlbt4x
Locale: LANG=pt_BR, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages libflac4 depends on:
ii debconf 1.4.41 Debian configuration management sy
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
-- no debconf information
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 288845-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jan 2005 00:46:16 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 10 16:46:15 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mta13.mail.adelphia.net (mta13.adelphia.net) [68.168.78.44]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CoAAp-0006ns-00; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:46:15 -0800
Received: from mizar.alcor.net ([69.167.148.207]) by mta13.adelphia.net
(InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 19:45:44 -0500
Received: by mizar.alcor.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 56145B87C9; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:45:58 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:45:58 -0800
From: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Processed: This bug is in libflac4
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
I've done all that I can do about this bug; all that remains is for packages
depending on libflac4 to be recompiled.
--
- mdz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
