Your message dated Thu, 13 Jan 2005 03:24:11 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Close.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2004 12:27:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 02 04:27:03 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from b099166.adsl.hansenet.de (aj.andaco.de) [62.109.99.166]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B9NlG-0001xY-00; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 04:27:03 -0800
Received: from aj by aj.andaco.de with local (Exim 4.30)
id 1B9Nkk-0005un-9I; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 14:26:30 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: build-essential: Support for amd64 architecture is missing
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.56
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 14:26:29 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: build-essential
Version: 10
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Building 'build-essential' on amd64 fails because there is no
'essential-packages-list-amd64'. After creating this file by
copying 'essential-packages-list-i386' the build was succesful.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.4-1-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages build-essential depends on:
ii dpkg-dev 1.10.20 Package building tools for Debian
ii g++ 4:3.3.3-2 The GNU C++ compiler
ii gcc 4:3.3.3-2 The GNU C compiler
ii libc6-dev [libc-dev] 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Development Librari
ii make 3.80-6 The GNU version of the "make" util
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 241689-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2005 03:24:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 12 19:24:20 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from populous.netsplit.com (mailgate.netsplit.com) [62.49.129.34]
(qmailr)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Covat-000857-00; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 19:24:20 -0800
Received: (qmail 3957 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2005 03:24:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by populous.netsplit.com with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 13 Jan 2005
03:24:17 -0000
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id DC1C431EE3F6; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 03:24:11 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 03:24:11 +0000
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Close.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott James Remnant)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Just noticed that I failed to close this bug with the upload to add the
file, Goswin confirms in the bug that the bug is only that the file is
non-existant, and not about its contents.
Scott
--=20
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
--cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB5enbIexP3IStZ2wRAi8ZAKCRcBc5iZhcr31rePG37tZrQRcIoACeO+4+
OSzp7pj885gbSzHI5JhbjdM=
=CxNf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
