Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2005 11:39:09 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#208298: wchar.h fails to declare wcwidth() and wcswidth()
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Sep 2003 23:42:06 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 01 18:42:05 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mailgate.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de [129.13.64.97]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19tyJB-0000lW-00; Mon, 01 Sep 2003 18:42:05 -0500
Received: from hadio112.hadiko.uni-karlsruhe.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
[172.20.45.27])
by mailgate.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1)
id 19tyJA-0002hu-00; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 01:42:04 +0200
Received: from ruediger by hadio112.hadiko.uni-karlsruhe.de with local (Exim
3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 19tyJA-0001w9-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 01:42:04 +0200
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 01:42:04 +0200
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=FCdiger?= Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: wchar.h fails to declare wcwidth() and wcswidth()
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_30,FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.2-4
Even though the man page for wcwidth and wcswidth() claim that these
functions conform to "UNIX98" and "POSIX 1003.1-2001", they're only declared
when the macro __USE_XOPEN (via _XOPEN_SOURCE) is defined. I don't know
whether these function should be declared by default, but at least they
should if _ISOC99_SOURCE is defined - which, however, doesn't set
__USE_XOPEN.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 208298-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jan 2005 02:39:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 15 18:39:10 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Cq0Jq-0005Eq-00; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 18:39:10 -0800
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 0ADDDDEE24; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 11:39:09 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 11:39:09 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=FCdiger?= Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#208298: wchar.h fails to declare wcwidth() and wcswidth()
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
At Tue, 2 Sep 2003 01:42:04 +0200,
R=FCdiger Kuhlmann wrote:
> Even though the man page for wcwidth and wcswidth() claim that these
> functions conform to "UNIX98" and "POSIX 1003.1-2001", they're only decla=
red
> when the macro __USE_XOPEN (via _XOPEN_SOURCE) is defined. I don't know
> whether these function should be declared by default, but at least they
> should if _ISOC99_SOURCE is defined - which, however, doesn't set
> __USE_XOPEN.
This is incorrect. ISO C99 does not say about wcwidth and wcswidth.
Closed.
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
