Your message dated Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:40:19 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in 2.2.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Nov 2004 16:12:36 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 10 08:12:36 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mailgate.netsec.net [65.213.201.103]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CRv5I-0003b1-00; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 08:12:36 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by mailgate.netsec.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BBE01800ED
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:14:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailgate.netsec.net ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (mailgate.netsec.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with LMTP id 31029-01-6 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:14:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from shq-exchange.netsec.net (shq-exchange.netsec.net [192.168.0.119])
by mailgate.netsec.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34B87180175
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:14:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from SHQ-EXU1.netsec.net ([192.168.0.73]) by shq-exchange.netsec.net
with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0);
Wed, 10 Nov 2004 11:11:51 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: does not update plugin directory in nessusd.conf
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 11:10:59 -0500
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: does not update plugin directory in nessusd.conf
Thread-Index: AcTHP939U8tuaD5YQxenvPj5lUA8dw==
From: "Andrew Oman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Nov 2004 16:11:51.0327 (UTC)
FILETIME=[FCE9E2F0:01C4C73F]
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at netsec.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATING,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: nessus-plugins
Version: 2.0.12-3
Severity: normal
Nessus-plugins doesn't update the plugin location in /etc/nessusd.conf
When running nessus-update-plugins, the script checks nessusd.conf for
the plugin location and uses that, even if -d /var/lib/nessus/plugins is
specified
Since the package moves the location of the plugins, I assume the
package should be responsible for updating related files, or at least
warning the user to manually update the location.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (700, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25-1-386
Locale: LANG=3Den_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US.UTF-8
Versions of packages nessus-plugins depends on:
ii debconf 1.4.30.10 Debian configuration
management sy
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared
libraries an
ii libnessus2 2.0.12-2 Nessus shared libraries
ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7d-5 SSL shared libraries
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 280625-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jan 2005 16:40:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 24 08:40:22 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tornado.dat.etsit.upm.es (dat.etsit.upm.es) [138.100.17.73]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ct7GH-0004xx-00; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 08:40:21 -0800
Received: (qmail 12383 invoked by uid 1013); 24 Jan 2005 16:40:19 -0000
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:40:19 +0100
From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed in 2.2.0-4
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/aVve/J9H4Wl5yVO"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--/aVve/J9H4Wl5yVO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This bug was actually fixed in 2.2.0-4 but since it was fixed in an interim=
=20
release (2.2.0-2) which was not uploaded to the archive it was not closed=
=20
automatically.
Regards
Javier
--/aVve/J9H4Wl5yVO
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB9STzi4sehJTrj0oRAlS3AJ4n5uvAXFCuspe14HQzeV/rUovYYwCcCpI8
vr0vS/qBL/g7AFGNi+yAUak=
=dfg3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--/aVve/J9H4Wl5yVO--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
