Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:21:43 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug no longer applies
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2004 19:56:38 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 09 13:56:37 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.33]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AewJI-0004Bb-00; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 07:04:20 -0600
Received: by mmjgroup.com (Postfix, from userid 105)
id 7DBFD1757B; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 06:04:08 -0700 (MST)
Received: from mix.mmjgroup.com (mix.mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.31])
by mmjgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EC6B16EC9
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 06:04:07 -0700 (MST)
Received: by mix.mmjgroup.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id C0D4723826; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 06:04:06 -0700 (MST)
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 06:04:05 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: db4.1_4.1.25-11(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: bad build-depends
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.8 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,NO_REAL_NAME
autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level:
Package: db4.1
Version: 4.1.25-11
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of db4.1_4.1.25-11 on sarti by sbuild/hppa 1.170.4
> Build started at 20040109-0527
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: tcl8.4-dev, procps |not+linux-gnu, gcj
> |hppa|mips|mipsel|gnu|kfreebsd-gnu|knetbsd-gnu, fastjar
> |hppa|mips|mipsel|gnu|kfreebsd-gnu|knetbsd-gnu
[...]
A full build log can be found at:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=hppa&pkg=db4.1&ver=4.1.25-11
gcj does not exist on hppa, which means that this previously-building
package will be blocked from building until either gcj exists, or the
dependency is adjusted.
lamont
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 226978-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jan 2005 13:22:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 25 05:22:19 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from imap.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CtQeA-0002zA-00; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 05:22:19 -0800
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 25 Jan 2005 13:21:47 -0000
Received: from ppp-82-135-11-113.mnet-online.de (EHLO localhost.localdomain)
(82.135.11.113)
by mail.gmx.net (mp027) with SMTP; 25 Jan 2005 14:21:47 +0100
X-Authenticated: #686195
Received: from mbanck by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CtQdb-0002Tj-RP
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:21:43 +0100
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:21:43 +0100
From: Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug no longer applies
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Sender: Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
It appears type-handling has since been modified to not act like a
virtual package, and thus the problem no longer persists. As (to the
best of my knowledge) all other Build-Depends on virtual packages need
to specify a real package as alternative, I close this bug.
This is what the type-handling maintainer said on this matter:
<nyu> azeem: the bug description is inaccurate. sbuild has a generic
problem with virtual packages
<nyu> azeem: but since the virtual package functionality in t-h is
deprecated, i didn't bother
<nyu> (t-h is used as a script now)
If you feel this should be fixed in this version of sbuild, feel free to
reopen the bug at normal priority or less and retitle it appropriatly.
thanks,
Michael
--
Michael Banck
Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
