Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:02:32 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#273000: fixed in sa-exim 4.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Sep 2004 10:59:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 23 03:59:05 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from xs4all.vs19.net (spaans.vs19.net) [213.84.236.198] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CARJZ-0002wD-00; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 03:59:05 -0700
Received: from spaans by spaans.vs19.net with local (Exim 4.34)
        id 1CARJ2-0001wO-3A; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:58:32 +0200
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:58:32 +0200
From: Jasper Spaans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: sa-exim: superfluous questioning in postrm
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.99.3
X-Copyright: Copyright 2004 Jasper Spaans, unauthorised distribution prohibited
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i
Sender: Jasper Spaans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: sa-exim
Version: 4.1-1
Severity: minor


When uninstalling, the postrm script asks whether saved mails should be
removed. This question might seem legitimate, as /var/spool/sa-exim is not
empty. However, in my case it only contains (empty) directories which can be
purged without problems.

The code in question:

        if [ -e /var/spool/sa-exim ] && ! rmdir /var/spool/sa-exim
2>/dev/null ; then
                db_version 2.0
                db_input medium sa-exim/purge_spool || true
                db_go || true
                db_get sa-exim/purge_spool
                purge_spool="$RET"
                if [ "x${purge_spool}" = "xtrue" ] ; then
                        rm -rf /var/spool/sa-exim
                fi
        fi

Maybe a test like

        if [ $(find /var/spool/sa-exim -type f|wc -l) -gt 0 ] || \
             ! rm -rf /var/spool/sa-exim 2>/dev/null ; then

will work better. (I have to admit, this is ugly code, but it should work)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-rc2
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Versions of packages sa-exim depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]       1.4.36       Debian configuration management sy
ii  exim4-daemon-heavy          4.34-6       Exim (v4) with extended features, 
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  spamc                       2.64-1       Client for perl-based spam filteri

-- 
Jasper Spaans                                       http://jsp.vs19.net/
 12:58:12 up 10081 days,  3:45, 1 user, load average: 4.67 4.81 5.94
  -... .- -.. --. . .-. -... .- -.. --. . .-. -... .- -.. --. . .-.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 273000-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jan 2005 19:06:04 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 25 11:06:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CtW0q-0002nL-00; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:06:04 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CtVxQ-0000l8-00; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:02:32 -0500
From: Sander Smeenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#273000: fixed in sa-exim 4.2-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:02:32 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: sa-exim
Source-Version: 4.2-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
sa-exim, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

sa-exim_4.2-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/sa-exim/sa-exim_4.2-1.diff.gz
sa-exim_4.2-1.dsc
  to pool/main/s/sa-exim/sa-exim_4.2-1.dsc
sa-exim_4.2-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/sa-exim/sa-exim_4.2-1_i386.deb
sa-exim_4.2.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/s/sa-exim/sa-exim_4.2.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Sander Smeenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated sa-exim package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 21:24:57 +0100
Source: sa-exim
Binary: sa-exim
Architecture: source i386
Version: 4.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sander Smeenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Sander Smeenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 sa-exim    - Use SpamAssassin at SMTP time with the Exim v4 MTA
Closes: 266714 266791 267230 273000 282097
Changes: 
 sa-exim (4.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   + New upstream version.
   + Updated ja.po closes: #266791
   + Updated da.po closes: #266714, #282097
   + New greylisting mechanism in spamassassin 3.x and a new and clearer
     way for sa-exim to integrate with that closes: #267230
   + Superfluous questioning fix closes: #273000
Files: 
 02a35977b379c6d10615e85063fffebc 563 mail optional sa-exim_4.2-1.dsc
 e7925a4d82127ba3da7e53aef9804dd8 56329 mail optional sa-exim_4.2.orig.tar.gz
 e7953c1b79685955fd02f4471537a381 7798 mail optional sa-exim_4.2-1.diff.gz
 45a9af603d10130c223f6a82d852f0de 59176 mail optional sa-exim_4.2-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFB9pH11GN+QQjOyU0RAuywAJ99O250SK7WVsl7KR0AgWLnFo+elQCdFYaw
dy3zCP+zDD5B5/PJjgD4mx8=
=COMG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to