Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:32:41 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#145478: fixed in tetex-src 2.0.2a-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 2 May 2002 01:33:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 01 20:33:05 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 24-6-203.wireless.lcs.mit.edu (skiffserv) [18.24.6.203]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 1735Sx-0004cx-00; Wed, 01 May 2002 20:33:03 -0500
Received: from cananian by skiffserv with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1735Sw-0007Dp-00; Wed, 01 May 2002 21:33:02 -0400
From: "C. Scott Ananian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: tetex-doc: multidoc.doc has extra /end{description}
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 21:33:01 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: "C. Scott Ananian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: tetex-doc
Version: 1.0.2+20011202-3
Severity: minor
The file /usr/share/doc/texmf/generic/pstricks/multido.doc.gz
installed by the package 'tetex-doc' has an extra \end{description}
line at the very end of the file (in the changelog). Because of this,
it will not build as documentation. (Uncompress and run 'latex multidoc.doc'
to reproduce.) The fix is very simple: remove the offending \end{description}
line. A built copy of this document should then be included in the tetex-doc
package.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux skiffserv 2.4.17 #1 Fri Feb 8 14:08:32 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages tetex-doc depends on:
ii dpkg 1.9.20 Package maintenance system for Deb
ii tetex-base 1.0.2+20011202-3 basic teTeX library files
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 145478-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jan 2005 18:36:36 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 25 10:36:36 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CtVYK-000638-00; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:36:36 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CtVUX-0007XN-00; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:32:41 -0500
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#145478: fixed in tetex-src 2.0.2a-3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:32:41 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3
Source: tetex-src
Source-Version: 2.0.2a-3
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tetex-src, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
tetex-src_2.0.2a-3.diff.gz
to pool/main/t/tetex-src/tetex-src_2.0.2a-3.diff.gz
tetex-src_2.0.2a-3.dsc
to pool/main/t/tetex-src/tetex-src_2.0.2a-3.dsc
tetex-src_2.0.2a-3_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-src/tetex-src_2.0.2a-3_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Frank K�ster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated tetex-src package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:59:10 +0100
Source: tetex-src
Binary: tetex-src
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.2a-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: teTeX maintainers <[email protected]>
Changed-By: Frank K�ster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
tetex-src - teTeX texmf source files
Closes: 145478 267583 289928
Changes:
tetex-src (2.0.2a-3) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Acknowledge the bugs that were closed in 2.0.2a-1, which was
erroneously regarded as an NMU (closes: #267583, #145478)
* The same upload also removed all non-free files from deb and
orig.tar.gz, therefore (closes: #289928)
Files:
a568f59388e0ffffe06269dc19881844 745 tex extra tetex-src_2.0.2a-3.dsc
d530282370bed232b0c21e6cedaeec49 2983 tex extra tetex-src_2.0.2a-3.diff.gz
302c6e398360e1b47918fe23b6d1b848 22833610 tex extra tetex-src_2.0.2a-3_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB9ozW+xs9YyJS+hoRAtDyAJ4uqGcUlK2s4tMrTZ8Ytf0f0OeGCgCfZHfy
Re0yTR6Zk/bHomJNmPo3FCE=
=Q9DA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
