Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2005 15:05:09 +1030
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#292265: libwxgtk2.5-dev: Missing Depends: on libtiff4-dev 
and others
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jan 2005 00:26:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 25 16:26:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from brandeis.paip.net (smtp.paip.net) [216.113.17.131] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Ctb0T-0005Sz-00; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:26:02 -0800
Received: from iang by smtp.paip.net with local (Exim 4.34)
        id 1CtawI-0008SW-Na; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:21:42 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ian Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libwxgtk2.5-dev: Missing Depends: on libtiff4-dev and others
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:21:41 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Ian Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libwxgtk2.5-dev
Version: 2.5.3.2
Severity: important

libwxgtk2.5-dev provides the wx-config program to let you do
`wx-config --cxxflags`, etc. in your Makefile.

If you want to build a program with wxWidgets linked statically, you
use `wx-config --static --libs`, which outputs:

-pthread   -L/usr/X11R6/lib  /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.5.a
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_html-2.5.a /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_adv-2.5.a
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.5.a /usr/lib/libwx_baseu_xml-2.5.a
/usr/lib/libwx_baseu_net-2.5.a /usr/lib/libwx_baseu-2.5.a
-Wl,--export-dynamic -pthread -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0
-lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lpangoxft-1.0 -lpangox-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lgobject-2.0
-lgmodule-2.0 -lgthread-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -lXinerama -lXxf86vm -lpng -ljpeg
-ltiff -lexpat -lz -ldl -lm -lwxregexu-2.5

But this means that you need to have libtiff.so (from the libtiff4-dev
package), as well as the dev packages for the other listed libraries.
Should these not be listed as Depends: for libwxgtk2.5-dev ?

   - Ian

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages libwxgtk2.5-dev depends on:
ii  libc6-dev                   2.3.2.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Development Librari
ii  libwxgtk2.5.3               2.5.3.2      wxWidgets Cross-platform C++ GUI t
ii  wx2.5-headers               2.5.3.2      wxWidgets Cross-platform C++ GUI t

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 292265-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jan 2005 05:08:34 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 25 21:08:34 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ppp137-72.lns1.adl2.internode.on.net (hank.shelbyville.oz) 
[150.101.137.72] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Ctetk-0003oX-00; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 20:35:20 -0800
Received: from ron by hank.shelbyville.oz with local (Exim 4.43)
        id 1CtetZ-0006r5-P5; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 15:05:09 +1030
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 15:05:09 +1030
To: Ian Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#292265: libwxgtk2.5-dev: Missing Depends: on libtiff4-dev and 
others
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 07:21:41PM -0500, Ian Goldberg wrote:
> Package: libwxgtk2.5-dev
> Version: 2.5.3.2
> Severity: important
> 
> libwxgtk2.5-dev provides the wx-config program to let you do
> `wx-config --cxxflags`, etc. in your Makefile.
> 
> If you want to build a program with wxWidgets linked statically, you
> use `wx-config --static --libs`, which outputs:
> 
> -pthread   -L/usr/X11R6/lib  /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.5.a
> /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_html-2.5.a /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_adv-2.5.a
> /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.5.a /usr/lib/libwx_baseu_xml-2.5.a
> /usr/lib/libwx_baseu_net-2.5.a /usr/lib/libwx_baseu-2.5.a
> -Wl,--export-dynamic -pthread -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0
> -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lpangoxft-1.0 -lpangox-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lgobject-2.0
> -lgmodule-2.0 -lgthread-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -lXinerama -lXxf86vm -lpng -ljpeg
> -ltiff -lexpat -lz -ldl -lm -lwxregexu-2.5
> 
> But this means that you need to have libtiff.so (from the libtiff4-dev
> package), as well as the dev packages for the other listed libraries.
> Should these not be listed as Depends: for libwxgtk2.5-dev ?

No, I don't think so, because you can build wx apps that don't depend
on libtiff et al.  Certainly any app package that calls wx-config as
you show above should build depend in this way, but you don't need these
libraries for this package to be functional, and people who don't need
them shouldn't be forced to install them as a convenience to people who
do.

I'll look if some suggestions might be in order though.

thanks,
Ron


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to