Your message dated Thu, 27 Jan 2005 01:23:45 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#282396: netbase: Missing port 2641 (Handle protocol)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Nov 2004 20:13:57 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 21 12:13:57 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ns2.netaktiv.com (soyouz2.netaktiv.com) [80.67.170.3]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CVy5s-0002ZM-00; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 12:13:56 -0800
Received: by soyouz2.netaktiv.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
id AB38FA7BC5; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 21:13:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: by fetiche (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 90CB917B52; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 21:13:45 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: netbase: Missing port 2641 (Handle protocol)
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 21:13:44 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: netbase
Version: 4.18
Severity: minor
Port 2641, the Handle protocol (RFC 3650, 3651 and 3652) is missing
from /etc/services.
I am not aware of a DFSG-free implementation of Handle but having its
port in /etc/services would make tcpdump on the Debian router nicer.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-1-k6
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR
Versions of packages netbase depends on:
ii debconf 1.4.30.8 Debian configuration management sy
ii ifupdown 0.6.4-4.8 High level tools to configure netw
ii iputils-ping [ping] 3:20020927-2 Tools to test the reachability of
ii netkit-inetd 0.10-9 The Internet Superserver
ii tcpd 7.6.dbs-6 Wietse Venema's TCP wrapper utilit
-- debconf information:
netbase/spoofprot/pre-2.2-ip: 127.0.0.1/8
netbase/upgrade-note/etc-network-interfaces-pre-3.17-1:
netbase/upgrade-note/init.d-split-pre-3.16-1:
netbase/upgrade-note/radius-ports-pre-3.05:
netbase/ipv6-hosts: true
netbase/spoofprot/pre-2.2-interfaces: eth0 eth1 ppp0
* netbase/spoofprot:
netbase/upgrade-note/portmap-restart-pre-3.11-2:
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 282396-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jan 2005 00:39:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 26 16:39:06 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from attila.bofh.it [213.92.8.2] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ctxgg-0004IT-00; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 16:39:06 -0800
Received: by attila.bofh.it (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 2141C5F796; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 01:39:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: by wonderland.linux.it (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id 5EB5F1D3F4; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 01:23:45 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 01:23:45 +0100
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#282396: netbase: Missing port 2641 (Handle protocol)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Nov 21, Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Port 2641, the Handle protocol (RFC 3650, 3651 and 3652) is missing
> from /etc/services.
>=20
> I am not aware of a DFSG-free implementation of Handle but having its
> port in /etc/services would make tcpdump on the Debian router nicer.
I do not consider it a suitable candidate for the default /etc/services
file: even if this is a standard port, the protocol is not on the
standards track, not widely used and not implemented in Debian.
--=20
ciao,
Marco
--2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB+DSRFGfw2OHuP7ERAoDsAJ9dXlfI08F4GxWQ1cCZGOHm8QGEuACfXe6/
D8He38fWMyJNsDFoMtA2OAs=
=GQFQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
