Your message dated Sat, 5 Feb 2005 17:25:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Dec 2004 10:26:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 05 02:26:10 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vsmtp1.tin.it [212.216.176.141] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Catak-00018y-00; Sun, 05 Dec 2004 02:26:10 -0800
Received: from ashland.casa (80.180.89.164) by vsmtp1.tin.it (7.0.027)
        id 41A37E5C004A6F6E; Sun, 5 Dec 2004 11:25:40 +0100
Received: by ashland.casa (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 2B49D4C5C0; Sun,  5 Dec 2004 11:23:50 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "David N. Welton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: strace segfaulting
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 11:23:50 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: strace
Version: 4.5.5-1
Severity: normal


Attempting to use strace to debug a problem with Tcl from the CVS
HEAD:

@ashland [~/workshop/tcl/unix] $ make strace OPTS='-fF -o goober -s
5000' SCRIPT=./hello.tcl 
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=`pwd`:; export LD_LIBRARY_PATH; \
TCL_LIBRARY="/home/davidw/workshop/tcl/library"; export TCL_LIBRARY; \
strace -fF -o goober -s 5000 ./tclsh ./hello.tcl
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

It gets this far:

25496 select(809171712, [5 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1072
1073 1084 109
1 1092 1095 1096 1097 1101 1102 1136 1137 1148 1159 1163 1164 1166
1167 1168 116
9 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182
1186 1187 118
8 1189 1191 1193 1194 1196 1197 1212 1219 1220 1223 1224 1225 1229
1230 1252 125
3 1256 1261 1262 1264 1276 1280 1376 1424 1425 1436 1456 1457 1468
1475 1477 147
9 1480 1481 1482 1484 1486 1487 1488 1489 1490 1491 1492 1493 1494
1495 1496 149
7 1498 1499 1500 1501 1502 1520 1521 1532 1552 1553 1564 1584 1585
1596 1604 161
1 1613 1615 1618 1628 1648 1649 1660 1671 1675 1676 1678 1679 1680
1681 1682 168
3 1684 1685 1686 1687 1688 1689 1690 1691 1692 1693 1694 1697 1701
1705 1723 172

....


05 82908 82910 82912 82913 82914 82915 82918 82922 82924 82926 82928
82931 82934
 82938 82942 829

and at this point it dies.  gdb with the core file produces nothing
useful.  As it says below, I'm on a ppc machine, which may be
relevant.  The Tcl bug I'm after is, I believe, related to threading,
so that may be a clue as well.

Thanks,
Dave

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.6
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages strace depends on:
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 284290-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Feb 2005 01:25:14 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 05 17:25:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.23] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CxbAo-0001yg-00; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 17:25:14 -0800
Received: (qmail 20339 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2005 01:25:14 -0000
Received: from gateway.sf.frob.com ([64.81.54.130])
          (envelope-sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
          by mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
          for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 6 Feb 2005 01:25:13 -0000
Received: from magilla.sf.frob.com (magilla.sf.frob.com [198.49.250.228])
        by gateway.sf.frob.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id 17B70357B; Sat,  5 Feb 2005 17:25:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from magilla.sf.frob.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
        by magilla.sf.frob.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j161PBpp008177;
        Sat, 5 Feb 2005 17:25:11 -0800
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by magilla.sf.frob.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j161PBSP008174;
        Sat, 5 Feb 2005 17:25:11 -0800
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 17:25:11 -0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: closing
X-Antipastobozoticataclysm: 
   When George Bush projectile vomits antipasto on the Japanese.
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

I cannot reproduce any such problem.  If there is a bug with the latest
version, file a new report with concise instructions to reproduce it.
You need to include exact package versions for anything that might be relevant.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to