Your message dated Mon, 7 Feb 2005 00:17:49 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line uw-imap_7:2002edebian1-5: FTBFS: Epilogue count of 4294967296 
exceeds number of nested prologues
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jan 2005 00:23:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 03 16:23:09 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cpe-138-217-163-107.vic.bigpond.net.au (motilon.apana.org.au) 
[138.217.163.107] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1ClcTd-0001D4-00; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 16:23:09 -0800
Received: from calima.apana.org.au (tairona.apana.org.au [203.12.238.226])
        by motilon.apana.org.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB0A2118
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue,  4 Jan 2005 11:23:11 +1100 (EST)
Received: from nukak.apana.org.au (nukak.apana.org.au [203.12.238.230])
        by calima.apana.org.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF3AF1FF1
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue,  4 Jan 2005 11:23:06 +1100 (EST)
Received: by nukak.apana.org.au (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 4C0181D1433; Tue,  4 Jan 2005 11:23:05 +1100 (EST)
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 11:23:05 +1100
From: Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: uw-imap_7:2002edebian1-5: FTBFS: Epilogue count of 4294967296 exceeds 
number of nested prologues
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="21BR8y1c1zpF/Inb"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--21BR8y1c1zpF/Inb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: uw-imap
Severity: serious
Version: 7:2002edebian1-5
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

Automatic build of uw-imap_7:2002edebian1-5 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 1.170.5
Build started at 20050103-1728

[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: cdbs, dh-buildinfo, libpam-dev, libkrb5-dev, comerr-dev, 
libssl-dev, debhelper (>= 4.1), d-shlibs (>> 0.13), perl

[...]
/tmp/ccFmcUxT.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccFmcUxT.s:12555: Error: Epilogue count of 4294967296 exceeds number of 
nested prologues (0)
[...]
make[4]: *** [osdep.o] Error 1


Full build logs are available on buildd.debian.org.

Please refer to the build log at:

http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=uw-imap&ver=7%3A2002edebian1-5&arch=ia64&stamp=1104773338&file=log&as=raw

If you believe this bug should be reassigned to one or more packages,
you must clone it and then reassign it to the other packages, like
so:

clone <bug#> -1
clone <bug#> -2
clone <bug#> -3
reassign -1 <package1>
reassign -2 <package2>
reassign -3 <package3>
thanks

Anibal Monsalve Salazar
--
 .''`. Debian GNU/Linux
: :' : Free Operating System
`. `'  http://debian.org/
  `-   http://v7w.com/anibal

--21BR8y1c1zpF/Inb
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFB2eHpipBneRiAKDwRAkJDAJ9EjzQEeRzWtTLWZXuqR+MHFlzVhgCdGw5S
hdIZhx6KYfg8p3qCP1/9vNE=
=J5V/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--21BR8y1c1zpF/Inb--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 288485-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Feb 2005 08:17:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 07 00:17:52 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain) 
[66.93.39.86] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Cy45g-0008Oa-00; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 00:17:52 -0800
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 5749717229E; Mon,  7 Feb 2005 00:17:49 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 00:17:49 -0800
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: uw-imap_7:2002edebian1-5: FTBFS: Epilogue count of 4294967296 
exceeds number of nested prologues
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Version 7:2002edebian1-6 of uw-imap built without incident on all
architectures; closing this bug.

--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

--IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD4DBQFCByQqKN6ufymYLloRAhpoAJds4CSeSDj4ias8UatnzE7dQWvlAJ9mmo5Q
LPFTllqf4+vL7Sjg9goCPA==
=up7O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to