Your message dated Mon, 7 Feb 2005 17:37:51 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#238344: Cannot reproduce anymore
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Mar 2004 17:26:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 16 09:26:12 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pob.cs.unibo.it [130.136.10.114] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1B3IKS-0006wu-00; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:26:12 -0800
Received: from le1.cs.unibo.it (backle.cs.unibo.it [130.136.10.110])
        by pob.cs.unibo.it (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id C1D4B2A77C; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 18:25:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mitac ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.136.4.66])
        by le1.cs.unibo.it (8.9.3p2/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id 
SAA30687;
        Tue, 16 Mar 2004 18:25:34 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: le1.cs.unibo.it: Host [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[130.136.4.66] claimed to be mitac
Received: from enrico by mitac with local (Exim 4.30)
        id 1B3IDG-000266-1k; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 18:18:46 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libnet_init(): unknown physical layer type 0x30f
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.49
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 18:18:35 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libnet1
Version: 1.1.1rel-2
Severity: normal

Hello,

On my system, libnet_init fails with the message "unknown physical layer type 
0x30f".

For example:
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# : | guessnet eth0
        libnetException: unknown physical layer type 0x30f
         opening link interface

        [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# arping
        arping: libnet_init(): unknown physical layer type 0x30f

        [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# arping <local eth address>
        arping: libnet_init(): unknown physical layer type 0x30f

        [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# arping localhost
        arping: libnet_init(): unknown physical layer type 0x30f

I can't understand how it happens: if I do SIOCGIFHWADDR on my system, I
get a sockaddr of type 0x1 (ARPHRD_ETHER), not 0x30f, and the libnet
code just does a SIOCGIFHWADDR.


Bye,

Enrico


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.20
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Versions of packages libnet1 depends on:
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 238344-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Feb 2005 16:38:00 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 07 08:37:59 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (mail.netline.it) [217.19.149.7] 
        by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CyBtf-0002fT-00; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 08:37:59 -0800
Received: (qmail 99917 invoked by uid 106); 7 Feb 2005 16:36:19 -0000
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by mail.netline.it by uid 0 with 
qmail-scanner-1.22 
 (clamdscan: 0.73.  Clear:RC:0(82.48.85.37):. 
 Processed in 0.023547 secs); 07 Feb 2005 16:36:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO raptus.dandreoli.com) ([EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@82.48.85.37)
  by mail.netline.it with SMTP; 7 Feb 2005 16:36:18 -0000
Received: by raptus.dandreoli.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 9707F301606; Mon,  7 Feb 2005 17:37:51 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 17:37:51 +0100
From: Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#238344: Cannot reproduce anymore
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 04:49:58PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> Hello Domenico,
> 
> This is to inform that I cannot reproduce the bug anymore, as I changed
> the laptop.
> 
> Also, before I changed it the old one at some point started working
> again, so I imagine that a newer kernel version fixed the problem in the
> driver.
> 
> Noone has replied to this bug saying "me too", so I suspect it was a
> problem specific to an old version of the sis900 driver for that
> specific model.
> 
> At this point, I have no objections against closing this bug, 

ok, i'm then closing it. thank you.

ciao
domenico

-----[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok
 --[ http://people.debian.org/~cavok/gpgkey.asc
   ---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936  4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to