Your message dated Mon, 7 Feb 2005 21:39:05 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#293933: wrong default url_handler.sh
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Feb 2005 22:00:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 06 14:00:35 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from armagnac.ifi.unizh.ch (albatross.madduck.net) [130.60.75.72]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CxuSJ-0005Az-00; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 14:00:35 -0800
Received: from localhost (albatross.madduck.net [127.0.0.1])
by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id 3C2BD8C7354
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 23:00:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: from wing.madduck.net (84-72-19-134.dclient.hispeed.ch [84.72.19.134])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "wing.madduck.net", Issuer "madduck.net CA" (verified OK))
by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id B35F086EAAD
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 23:00:33 +0100 (CET)
Received: by wing.madduck.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id E4094602E81; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 23:00:32 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 23:00:32 +0100
From: martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: wrong default url_handler.sh
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.6
Organization: Debian GNU/Linux
X-OS: Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 kernel 2.6.10-wing i686
X-Motto: Keep the good times rollin'
X-Subliminal-Message: debian/rules!
X-Debbugs-No-Ack: please spare me
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-Virus-Scanned: by albatross.madduck.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: urlview
Version: 0.9-2.1
Severity: minor
> https_prgs=3D"/usr/bin/X11/netscape:PW"
I think this should be rewritten to use the alternatives system,
e.g. with things like x-www-browser.
Is this package being maintained at all?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (98, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-wing
Locale: LANG=3Den_GB, LC_CTYPE=3Den_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=3DUTF-8)
Versions of packages urlview depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared librarie=
s an
ii libncurses5 5.4-4 Shared libraries for terminal =
hand
-- no debconf information
--=20
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
=20
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
--GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCBpOAIgvIgzMMSnURAvQzAKCQ91lJRKTRk1YTlIUJCbMgjCvrrwCgm5J6
sSgu1He4jOD3lq7VPTONKyY=
=4Xp5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 293933-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Feb 2005 20:36:23 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 07 12:36:20 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp3.libero.it [193.70.192.127]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CyFcG-00046x-00; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 12:36:20 -0800
Received: from localhost (172.16.1.82) by smtp3.libero.it (7.0.027-DD01)
id 4207866900016276; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 21:35:45 +0100
Received: from localhost (151.38.231.50) by smtp1.libero.it (7.0.027-DD01)
id 41BF654A03C9B2CC; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 21:35:40 +0100
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 525828558D; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 21:39:05 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 21:39:05 +0100
From: Emanuele Rocca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#293933: wrong default url_handler.sh
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at libero.it serv3
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
* [ 06-02-05 - 23:00 ] martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: urlview
> Version: 0.9-2.1
You're using a *really* old version of urlview.
> > https_prgs="/usr/bin/X11/netscape:PW"
>
> I think this should be rewritten to use the alternatives system,
> e.g. with things like x-www-browser.
x-www-browser is already the default.
Please check if you're running a recent version of a package before
filing bug reports.
Thanks.
ciao,
ema
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
