Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2005 16:06:08 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#277906: tar bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2004 10:21:06 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 23 03:21:06 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vmlinux.org [193.41.214.66] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CLJ1F-00058c-00; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 03:21:05 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by vmlinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87AF3BE5C;
Sat, 23 Oct 2004 12:21:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from vmlinux.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (vmlinux [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 29456-05; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 12:20:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by vmlinux.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 68A22BE5B; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 12:20:47 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Joachim Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dpkg-deb: subprocess tar killed by signal (Aborted)
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 12:20:47 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: tar
Version: 1.13.93-4
Severity: normal
Hi!
Sorry, I see now that I should've reported this sooner before
tar in Sarge was frozen, but I still don't know if its something
wrong with my system or tar. Here goes...
We're running a very small old (PII-300MHz!) server that has been
the same system since two Debian releases ago, not counting Sarge
that we run now.
Personally I run Sarge on four other systems as well and have not
encountered this on any of them -- however, neither of them have
been upgraded release by release, they have been reinstalled.
Briefly, tar dies on SIGABORT (SIGABRT) when dpkg (run as root)
tries to unpack the control files of a package. When run as a
regular user (with sudo) everything is fine and when I symlink
/bin/tar to star and run as root evrything also works. So I
conclude that there must be:
a) something wrong with my system, or
b) something wrong with tar.
Please advice on what I can do to track this down. It's really
driving me off the nearest cliff. Below is the long version
of a sample run. (Capital letters not used for screaming.)
Regards
/Jocke
##### TRYING TO INSTALL ANY PACKAGE AS ROOT FAILS #####
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-get install rar
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
rar
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/246kB of archives.
After unpacking 429kB of additional disk space will be used.
dpkg-deb: subprocess tar killed by signal (Aborted)
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/rar_3.30-2_i386.deb
(--unpack):
subprocess dpkg-deb --control returned error exit status 2
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/rar_3.30-2_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
##### REPLACE TAR WITH STAR #####
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cd /bin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/bin# mv tar tar.old
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/bin# ln -s star tar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/bin# cd
##### ET VOILA #####
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-get install rar
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
rar
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/246kB of archives.
After unpacking 429kB of additional disk space will be used.
tar: current './' newer.
tar: 1 blocks + 0 bytes (total of 10240 bytes = 10.00k).
Selecting previously deselected package rar.
(Reading database ... 129265 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking rar (from .../archives/rar_3.30-2_i386.deb) ...
Setting up rar (3.30-2) ...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~#
##### RESTORE REGULAR TAR #####
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cd /bin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/bin# rm tar
rm: remove symbolic link `tar'? y
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/bin# mv tar.old tar
##### INSTALL AS REGULAR USER WITH SUDO, WEIRD! #####
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/bin# logout
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get install rar
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
rar
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/246kB of archives.
After unpacking 429kB of additional disk space will be used.
Selecting previously deselected package rar.
(Reading database ... 129265 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking rar (from .../archives/rar_3.30-2_i386.deb) ...
Setting up rar (3.30-2) ...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26
Locale: LANG=sv_SE.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.ISO-8859-1
Versions of packages tar depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 277906-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Feb 2005 15:22:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 12 07:22:09 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ms-smtp-04.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.58]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Czz61-0007Dl-00; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 07:22:09 -0800
Received: from andromeda (cpe-24-59-54-124.twcny.res.rr.com [24.59.54.124])
by ms-smtp-04.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
j1CFLxpl005986;
Sat, 12 Feb 2005 10:21:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from pryzbyj by andromeda with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1Czz5q-0004y9-00; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 10:21:58 -0500
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 10:21:57 -0500
Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net
[66.35.250.206])
by webmin.steelfarms.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29FB7128032
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 10:15:26 -0600 (CST)
Received: from vmlinux.org ([193.41.214.66])
by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.41)
id 1Czyqx-0001hk-6K
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 07:06:37 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by vmlinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C51112250;
Sat, 12 Feb 2005 16:07:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from vmlinux.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (vmlinux [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 19811-07; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 16:06:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [213.214.225.79] (unknown [213.214.225.79])
(using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by vmlinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F48312227;
Sat, 12 Feb 2005 16:06:57 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: Bug#277906: tar bug
From: Joachim Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: vmlinux.org:~/>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 16:06:08 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at vmlinux.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3
On Sat, 2005-02-12 at 03:00 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> I was wondering if root has MALLOC_CHECK_ set in the environment,
> which would explain why tar aborts.
Yes, you were right, thanks!
Regards
/Jocke
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
