Your message dated Tue, 15 Feb 2005 01:30:27 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#295317: /etc/init.d/networking: add support for ifrename
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Feb 2005 23:49:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 14 15:49:10 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ipanema.nitnet.com.br (nat.cesarb.net) [200.157.204.10] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1D0pxl-0002VM-00; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:49:10 -0800
Received: from cesarb by flower.home.cesarb.net with local (Exim 4.34)
        id 1D0pw9-0002g4-1G; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:47:29 -0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Cesar Eduardo Barros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: /etc/init.d/networking: add support for ifrename
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:47:28 -0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Cesar Eduardo Barros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: netbase
Version: 4.20
Severity: wishlist
File: /etc/init.d/networking
Tags: patch

It would be useful to add support for ifrename to
/etc/init.d/networking, as described in
/usr/share/doc/ifrename/HOTPLUG.txt.gz:

--- networking-orig     Wed Feb 18 13:56:23 2004
+++ networking  Fri Feb 20 14:51:06 2004
@@ -120,6 +120,15 @@ case "$1" in
         doopt syncookies no
         doopt ip_forward no
 
+       # Optionally remap interface names based on MAC address.
+       # '/sbin/ifrename' is part of wireless-tools package.
+       # /etc/iftab is currently not created by default. Jean II
+       if [ -x /sbin/ifrename ] && [ -r /etc/iftab ]; then
+           echo -n "Remapping network interfaces name: "
+           ifrename -p
+           echo "done."
+       fi
+
         echo -n "Configuring network interfaces..."
         ifup -a
        echo "done."

(I had to change :  to ... in the patch, and it applies with fuzz 1 and
an offset of -54 lines)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages netbase depends on:
ii  debconf                     1.4.30.11    Debian configuration management sy
ii  ifupdown                    0.6.4-4.10   High level tools to configure netw
ii  iputils-ping [ping]         3:20020927-2 Tools to test the reachability of 
ii  netkit-inetd                0.10-10      The Internet Superserver
ii  tcpd                        7.6.dbs-6    Wietse Venema's TCP wrapper utilit

-- debconf information excluded

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 295317-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2005 00:39:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 14 16:39:55 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from attila.bofh.it [213.92.8.2] (postfix)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1D0qks-0008Sz-00; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:39:55 -0800
Received: by attila.bofh.it (Postfix, from userid 10)
        id ADB025FA15; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 01:39:52 +0100 (CET)
Received: by wonderland.linux.it (Postfix, from userid 1001)
        id 0DC551C2A3; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 01:30:27 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 01:30:27 +0100
To: Cesar Eduardo Barros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#295317: /etc/init.d/networking: add support for ifrename
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Feb 15, Cesar Eduardo Barros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> It would be useful to add support for ifrename to
> /etc/init.d/networking, as described in
No, why? Ask the ifupdown maintainer.
/etc/init.d/networking will go away post-sarge.

--=20
ciao,
Marco

--LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCEUKjFGfw2OHuP7ERAgqBAJ0at36yZlNJphbsmDmCYwzLYc/QlgCgnc2X
gzqeccBdTx2Rdb2oipd2rWQ=
=ew6q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to