Your message dated Tue, 15 Feb 2005 01:40:16 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#294289: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#294289: upgrade to netbase
4.20 breaks lo]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Feb 2005 22:59:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 08 14:59:45 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cmailm2.svr.pol.co.uk [195.92.193.210]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CyeKf-0006RD-00; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 14:59:45 -0800
Received: from user-558.l2.c2.dsl.pol.co.uk ([81.77.98.46]
helo=localhost.localdomain)
by cmailm2.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.41)
id 1Cyd0E-0006Ko-A7; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 21:34:34 +0000
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1619635012=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Sean O'Dubhghaill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: upgrade to netbase 4.20 breaks lo
Bcc: Sean O'Dubhghaill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.7.1
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 21:34:51 +0000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.
--===============1619635012==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: netbase
Version: 4.20
Severity: normal
upgrading from netbase 4.19 to 4.20 causes lo to fail to start when starting my
computer. It
complains that the interface is already configured. When the computer has
started running
ifconfig shows no information about lo, but running ifup lo does not work
untill I first
ifdown lo. I've attached my /etc/network/interfaces file.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages netbase depends on:
ii debconf 1.4.45 Debian configuration management sy
ii ifupdown 0.6.4-4.10 High level tools to configure netw
ii iputils-ping [ping] 3:20020927-2 Tools to test the reachability of
ii netkit-inetd 0.10-10 The Internet Superserver
ii tcpd 7.6.dbs-6 Wietse Venema's TCP wrapper utilit
-- debconf information:
netbase/upgrade-note/etc-network-interfaces-pre-3.17-1:
netbase/upgrade-note/init.d-split-pre-3.16-1:
netbase/upgrade-note/radius-ports-pre-3.05:
netbase/upgrade-note/portmap-restart-pre-3.11-2:
--===============1619635012==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="interfaces"
# This file describes the network interfaces available on your system
# and how to activate them. For more information, see interfaces(5).
# The loopback network interface
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
# The primary network interface
#auto eth0
iface eth0 inet dhcp
iface eth1 inet dhcp
--===============1619635012==--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 294289-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2005 00:40:23 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 14 16:40:23 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from attila.bofh.it [213.92.8.2] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D0qlK-000066-00; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:40:23 -0800
Received: by attila.bofh.it (Postfix, from userid 10)
id E02705FA14; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 01:40:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: by wonderland.linux.it (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id BF5F21C2A3; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 01:40:16 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 01:40:16 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#294289: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#294289: upgrade to netbase 4.20
breaks lo]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="iVCmgExH7+hIHJ1A"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--iVCmgExH7+hIHJ1A
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Not a bug, closing.
--=20
ciao,
Marco
--iVCmgExH7+hIHJ1A
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCEUTwFGfw2OHuP7ERAv6rAKCghvD9Yi1ZvPNx0BAbzT8TP6yeNwCgkeaS
YTMAyyJx82o4EKaOLftDRp0=
=BMHS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--iVCmgExH7+hIHJ1A--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
