Your message dated Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:42:35 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#296270: xblast-tnt-images: should depend on xblast-tnt
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Feb 2005 13:20:57 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 21 05:20:57 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ns.achos.com (mail.achos.com) [213.133.111.40] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D3DUe-0005T8-00; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 05:20:57 -0800
Received: from grohl.achos.com (unknown [193.149.11.237])
by mail.achos.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 8D32A13D17; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 14:20:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: by grohl.achos.com (Postfix, from userid 1111)
id 116CB93D17; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 14:20:56 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Tobias Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xblast-tnt-images: should depend on xblast-tnt
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 14:20:56 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: xblast-tnt-images
Version: 20050106-1
Severity: minor
xblast-tnt-images should depend on xblast-tnt
so it get removed when xblast-tnt is removed.
Same is true for xblast-tnt-levels, xblast-tnt-models,
xblast-tnt-sounds and xblast-tnt-musics, but I
think it's no use filing individual bug reports,
is it?
tobias
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 296270-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Feb 2005 15:43:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 22 07:43:07 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from biedermanns.com (mail.biedermanns.com) [213.133.98.83] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D3cBn-0006Dt-00; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:43:07 -0800
Received: from [213.129.226.4] (helo=tausendmorgenwald.gwendoline.at)
by mail.biedermanns.com with asmtp
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1D3c6F-0000mp-00; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:37:23 +0100
Received: from alfie by tausendmorgenwald.gwendoline.at with local (Exim 3.35
#1 (Debian))
id 1D3cBH-0004AV-00; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:42:35 +0100
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:42:35 +0100
From: Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Tobias Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#296270: xblast-tnt-images: should depend on xblast-tnt
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Editor: Vi Improved <http://www.vim.org/>
X-Signature-Color: cyan
X-Signature-Prg: sigd/0.10.4 (Perl) <http://alfie.ist.org/projects/sigd/>
X-Face: "`Q5\Ix+YG'{KDq<>5mcZL8Sp7$[L|%#^MSk'{Qpp"J8.<RP*P9<{{6$8%_~*:6c{)<;e:s
!:C2%IH-5:GT<,Sf3Xx}di,JDbDRH/;-eb{n`VSi*}-R2,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
{3w}E7d}+GN<|v=gDc;.c(xiy{Og_=2cy)T1J"Lu}y6Onsr
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Sender: Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
* Tobias Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-21 14:20]:
> xblast-tnt-images should depend on xblast-tnt
> so it get removed when xblast-tnt is removed.
xblast-tnt-images doesn't need xblast-tnt, so I won't add that
dependency.
> Same is true for xblast-tnt-levels, xblast-tnt-models,
> xblast-tnt-sounds and xblast-tnt-musics, but I=20
> think it's no use filing individual bug reports,
> is it?
No, not really use, I would just close them just as this one, because
they don't need xblast-tnt to be useable. If you want to get them
removed on removing xblast-tnt please use a frontend that can
distinguish between packages that you selected to install and packages
that are installed because some dependency (like e.g. aptitude). Do you
see any library having a dependency on the programs that link to it?
This sounds strange...
So long,
Alfie
--=20
Defaults sind dazu da von DAUs ignoriert zu werden und damit die
Support-Stellen (aka #debian.de) zu verwirren.
-- #debian.de
--mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCG1LrMU96lewVKUIRAlPUAJ0cVOe1p75p50WZeFF4d4AMXFJAZACfUS5V
0oqBUDOCkMf6j4ciJA54MaE=
=tIut
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
