Your message dated Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:18:00 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line No follow ups and xfce removed now.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2003 09:36:50 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 14 04:35:55 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from msi2.arz.co.at [193.110.182.34] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 19bzkQ-0008Ez-00; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 04:35:54 -0500
Received: from 10.1.19.31(c860031f.m286) by msi2.arz.co.at via phion mailgw
        id 20030714-093547-11376-00; Mon Jul 14 09:35:47 2003
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.10  March 22, 2002
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 11:35:42 +0200
Subject: xfce: xscreensaver unknown option
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on LN000P50/SRV/ARZ-Com/AT(Release 6.0.1CF1 | 
March 06, 2003) at
 14.07.2003 11:35:47,
        Serialize complete at 14.07.2003 11:35:47
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0034B50CC1256D63_="
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=4.0
        tests=HAS_PACKAGE,HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE,NO_REAL_NAME
        version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--=_alternative 0034B50CC1256D63_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Package: xfce
Version: 3.8.16-3

when you run a sarge (testing) installation and use the xfce start script 
to start your X session there is a syntax error in the called script 
/etc/X11/xfce/xinitrc, see below:

$ cat .xsession-errors
[..]
/usr/bin/startxfce: X server already running on display :0
[..]
xscreensaver: unknown option "-lock-mode".  Try "-help".

because of this the screensaver daemon will not be started.

I suggest to correct the /etc/X11/xfce/xinitrc script (the -lock-mode flag 
seems to be an old option).
--=_alternative 0034B50CC1256D63_=
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"


<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Package: xfce</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Version: 3.8.16-3</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">when you run a sarge (testing) installation 
and use the xfce start script to start your X session there is a syntax error 
in the called script /etc/X11/xfce/xinitrc, see below:</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">$ cat .xsession-errors</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">[..]</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">/usr/bin/startxfce: X server already running 
on display :0</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">[..]</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">xscreensaver: unknown option 
&quot;-lock-mode&quot;. &nbsp;Try &quot;-help&quot;.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">because of this the screensaver daemon will 
not be started.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I suggest to correct the 
/etc/X11/xfce/xinitrc script (the -lock-mode flag seems to be an old 
option).</font>
--=_alternative 0034B50CC1256D63_=--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 201193-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Feb 2005 18:18:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 22 10:18:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from the.earth.li [193.201.200.66] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1D3ebg-0000F1-00; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:18:01 -0800
Received: from huggie by the.earth.li with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 1D3ebg-0002YZ-00; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:18:00 +0000
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:18:00 +0000
From: Simon Huggins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: No follow ups and xfce removed now.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Organization: Black Cat Networks, http://www.blackcatnetworks.co.uk/
X-Attribution: huggie
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,SORTED_RECIPS 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 8

xfce has been removed from the archive (note we recommend you use xfce4)
and either this bug is now irrelevant, there have been no follow ups to
a reasonable request from the maintainer on this bug for a long time or
I've not seen this bug in xfce4 so I'm closing it.

If you want further justification feel free to discuss it with me.

If you can reproduce them in xfce4 please reopen and reassign to xfce4
(or better the component you think is buggy) or start a new bug.

Thanks,

Simon.

-- 
oOoOo   "And 1.1.81 is officially BugFree(tm), so if you receive   oOoOo
 oOoOo any bug-reports on it, you know they are just evil lies."  oOoOo
  oOoOo                     - Linus Torvalds                     oOoOo
          htag.pl 0.0.22 ::::::: http://www.earth.li/~huggie/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to