Your message dated Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:27:45 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line New revision now packaged in Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jul 2004 22:40:41 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 25 15:40:41 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Borfd-0001Nu-00; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 15:40:41 -0700
Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (popix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de
[129.206.119.235])
by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
i6PMecIY023939
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 00:40:39 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de
[129.206.100.140])
by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id AAA5242988
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 00:40:38 +0200
Received: (qmail 11845 invoked by uid 0); 25 Jul 2004 22:40:37 -0000
Received: from ?80.137.14.182? (HELO live) (80.137.14.182)
by extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 25 Jul 2004
22:40:37 -0000
Received: from fernst by live with local (Exim 4.32)
id 1BorfX-0008Ra-NO
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 00:40:35 +0200
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 00:40:35 +0200
From: Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xmountains: New upstream release available (v2.7)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AqsLC8rIMeq19msA"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.63
X-GPG-Key: http://ernst.uni-hd.de/pubkey.asc
X-GPG-Fingerprint: 34F8 7997 8BC1 03F0 9C43 F3D7 B375 3E4D 514B 3E7C
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Sender: Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--AqsLC8rIMeq19msA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: xmountains
Severity: wishlist
Hello Torsten,
please consider packaging the newest upstream release (v2.7) when you
think it is due time.
Cheers,
Flo
--AqsLC8rIMeq19msA
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBBDbjs3U+TVFLPnwRAlTrAJ9X/wIBAkXb1+dUi7uTHqdVTk9IJQCglkUX
jp+jOeieBrhMbmvpXElrxYQ=
=8NVi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--AqsLC8rIMeq19msA--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 261429-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2005 09:35:48 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 01:35:48 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4FPQ-0006GK-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 01:35:48 -0800
Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (popix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de
[129.206.119.235])
by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
j1O9ZxfK019342
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:36:00 +0100 (MET)
Received: from extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de
[129.206.100.140])
by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA1704030
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:34:32 +0100
Received: (qmail 5617 invoked by uid 0); 24 Feb 2005 09:27:51 -0000
Received: from ?80.137.11.162? (HELO live) (80.137.11.162)
by extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 24 Feb 2005
09:27:51 -0000
Received: from fernst by live with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1D4FHd-0007cQ-KO
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:27:45 +0100
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:27:45 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: New revision now packaged in Debian
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8/UBlNHSEJa6utmr"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-GPG-Key: http://ernst.uni-hd.de/pubkey.asc
X-GPG-Fingerprint: 34F8 7997 8BC1 03F0 9C43 F3D7 B375 3E4D 514B 3E7C
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--8/UBlNHSEJa6utmr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
The package version the bugreport asks for is in Debian now:
| $ apt-cache policy xmountains
| xmountains:
| Installed: (none)
| Candidate: 2.7-2
| Version Table:
| 2.7-2 0
| 500 http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/main Packages
| 50 http://ftp.de.debian.org unstable/main Packages
Thus closing this bug.
Cheers,
Flo
--8/UBlNHSEJa6utmr
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCHZ4Rs3U+TVFLPnwRArmCAKCHD2d6aHccNH6tCnrbkkB83RX5IACfYIan
LJKV4PFb8BoMoEE2PpJmJGQ=
=93sF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--8/UBlNHSEJa6utmr--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
