Your message dated Fri, 25 Feb 2005 02:00:16 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in asterisk 1:1.0.5-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Dec 2004 10:00:38 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 22 02:00:38 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (mail.sicurweb.it) [212.141.157.67]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ch3IL-0005zE-00; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 02:00:38 -0800
Received: from ciop.localdomain (Autentiweb [80.183.146.150])
by mail.sicurweb.it (Postfix) with SMTP
id E4EC827F7A; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 10:59:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: by ciop.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 0)
id 05600350007; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 10:09:52 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Marco Parmeggiani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: asterisk: package with zaphfc patches
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 10:09:51 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: asterisk
Version: 1:1.0.2-2
Severity: wishlist
In order to use zaphfc with asterisk is necessary to apply some patches
to it. It would be nice to have a prepackaged asterisk built with those
patches. Obviously then there will be the need of a package including
the zaphfc kernel modules.
I'm signalling this because almost everyone on the asterisk user list,
if you own a hfc card, will tell you not to use isdn4linux and to use
zaphfc instead.
ciao
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages asterisk depends on:
ii asterisk-sounds-main 1:1.0.2-2 Sound files for asterisk
ii libasound2 1.0.6-5 ALSA library
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libedit2 2.9.cvs.20040827-1 BSD editline and history libraries
ii libexpat1 1.95.8-1 XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii libgcc1 1:3.4.2-2 GCC support library
ii libgsm1 1.0.10-13 Shared libraries for GSM speech co
ii libncurses5 5.4-4 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii libopenh323-1.13.2 1.13.5.4-4 H.323 aka VoIP library
ii libpq3 7.4.6-5 PostgreSQL C client library
ii libpri1 1.0.2-1 Primary Rate ISDN specification li
ii libpt-1.6.3 1.6.6.4-5 Portable Windows Library
ii libspeex1 1.0.rel.4-1 The Speex Speech Codec
ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-2 SSL shared libraries
ii libtonezone1 1:1.0.0-2 tonezone library (runtime)
ii unixodbc 2.2.4-11 ODBC tools libraries
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-3 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 286797-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Feb 2005 01:00:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 17:00:21 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from nyx.verfaction.de (mx.verfaction.de) [212.9.161.72] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4Tq8-0001em-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:00:21 -0800
Received: from erebos.verfaction.de
([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim)
by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16)
(Exim 4.34)
id 1D4Tq6-0004dt-Sv
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 02:00:19 +0100
Received: from ganymede.kk.de ([192.168.7.10] helo=ganymde.verfaction.de)
by homemx.verfaction.de with smtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1D4Tq4-00051w-5H
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 02:00:16 +0100
Received: by ganymde.verfaction.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 25 Feb 2005
02:00:17 +0100
From: "Kilian Krause" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-uwmCSab1n3qxGILc3rCj"
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 02:00:16 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3
X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.168.7.10 (ganymede.kk.de) incorrectly presented
itself as ganymde.verfaction.de
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed in asterisk 1:1.0.5-4
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--=-uwmCSab1n3qxGILc3rCj
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
the zaphfc patched asterisk from bristuff 0.2.0-RC7f is now in
incoming.=20
--=20
Best regards,
Kilian
--=-uwmCSab1n3qxGILc3rCj
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBCHnigvdkzt4X+wX8RAuZ3AJoCgKyeRYDzoX8ZGIcKsQMTAWXwBwCbBFLt
qQ5KE6QoAEYEKJBNdCbt+nk=
=vsHJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-uwmCSab1n3qxGILc3rCj--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
