Your message dated Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:03:27 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line apcupsd is not actually dependent on libgd2-noxpm / libgd2-xpm
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Feb 2005 20:37:40 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 19 12:37:40 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from devastator.energoncube.net [66.93.33.213] (devastator)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D2bMB-0002Jz-00; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 12:37:39 -0800
Received: from devastator.energoncube.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by devastator.energoncube.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id
j1JKbXro014464
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 12:37:34 -0800
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by devastator.energoncube.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j1JKbXkw014463;
Sat, 19 Feb 2005 12:37:33 -0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Authentication-Warning: devastator.energoncube.net: chaz set sender to [EMAIL
PROTECTED] using -f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Carl Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: apcupsd is not actually dependent on libgd2-noxpm / libgd2-xpm
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 12:37:33 -0800
X-Spam-Bayes-Status: Learned as HAM
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: apcupsd
Version: 3.10.16-6
Severity: minor
Nothing in the package is actually linking against libgd2.so. Requesting
removal of that dependency. I've got multiple headless boxes running
apcupsd on which I need to keep libgd2-noxpm, libfreetype6, libjpeg62
and libpng12-0 installed solely because apcupsd says it's dependent on
libgd2 (which, in turn, depends on the other three).
devastator:~# ldd /sbin/apc* /sbin/powerflute
/sbin/apcaccess:
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x00134000)
libwrap.so.0 => /lib/libwrap.so.0 (0x00185000)
libcrypto.so.0.9.7 => /usr/lib/i686/cmov/libcrypto.so.0.9.7 (0x0018e000)
libsnmp-0.4.2.so => /usr/lib/libsnmp-0.4.2.so (0x0028e000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x002f0000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00110000)
libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x00423000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x00438000)
/sbin/apcnisd:
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x00134000)
libwrap.so.0 => /lib/libwrap.so.0 (0x00185000)
libcrypto.so.0.9.7 => /usr/lib/i686/cmov/libcrypto.so.0.9.7 (0x0018e000)
libsnmp-0.4.2.so => /usr/lib/libsnmp-0.4.2.so (0x0028e000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x002f0000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00110000)
libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x00423000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x00438000)
/sbin/apctest:
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x00134000)
libwrap.so.0 => /lib/libwrap.so.0 (0x00185000)
libcrypto.so.0.9.7 => /usr/lib/i686/cmov/libcrypto.so.0.9.7 (0x0018e000)
libsnmp-0.4.2.so => /usr/lib/libsnmp-0.4.2.so (0x0028e000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x002f0000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00110000)
libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x00423000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x00438000)
/sbin/apcupsd:
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x00134000)
libwrap.so.0 => /lib/libwrap.so.0 (0x00185000)
libcrypto.so.0.9.7 => /usr/lib/i686/cmov/libcrypto.so.0.9.7 (0x0018e000)
libsnmp-0.4.2.so => /usr/lib/libsnmp-0.4.2.so (0x0028e000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x002f0000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00110000)
libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x00423000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x00438000)
/sbin/powerflute:
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x00134000)
libwrap.so.0 => /lib/libwrap.so.0 (0x00185000)
libcrypto.so.0.9.7 => /usr/lib/i686/cmov/libcrypto.so.0.9.7 (0x0018e000)
libsnmp-0.4.2.so => /usr/lib/libsnmp-0.4.2.so (0x0028e000)
libpanel.so.5 => /usr/lib/libpanel.so.5 (0x002f0000)
libform.so.5 => /usr/lib/libform.so.5 (0x002f4000)
libmenu.so.5 => /usr/lib/libmenu.so.5 (0x00300000)
libncurses.so.5 => /lib/libncurses.so.5 (0x00307000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x00346000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00110000)
libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x0047a000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x0048f000)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.29
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages apcupsd depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgd2-xpm 2.0.33-1.1 GD Graphics Library version 2
ii libncurses5 5.4-4 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii libsnmp4.2 4.2.5-5 NET SNMP (Simple Network Managemen
ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries
ii libwrap0 7.6.dbs-6 Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 296035-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Feb 2005 10:03:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 25 02:03:59 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ms005msg.fastwebnet.it [213.140.2.50]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4cKF-0007Sy-00; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 02:03:59 -0800
Received: from [37.7.86.90] (37.7.86.90) by ms005msg.fastwebnet.it (7.2.052.3)
id 41FFB24D0055FF50 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:03:28
+0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:03:27 +0100
From: Samuele Giovanni Tonon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: apcupsd is not actually dependent on libgd2-noxpm / libgd2-xpm
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
the package was splitted in three packages therefore it
will not depend on libgd2
Regards
Samuele
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
