Your message dated Sat, 26 Feb 2005 01:30:41 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Feb 2005 02:16:04 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 25 18:16:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4rUx-0007NU-00; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 18:16:03 -0800
Received: from 201-224-114-200.fibertel.com.ar (localhost.localdomain)
[200.114.224.201]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4rUw-0000qt-00; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 20:16:03 -0600
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: David Roguin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xmame: dpkg error procesing
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 23:14:13 +0000
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,
HAS_PACKAGE,OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: xmame
Version: 0.90-1
Severity: important
The following extra packages will be installed:
xmame xmame-x
The following NEW packages will be installed:
xmame-x
The following packages will be upgraded:
xmame
1 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 15 not upgraded.
51 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0B/17.2MB of archives.
After unpacking 104MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
(Reading database ... 112045 files and directories currently
installed.)
Preparing to replace xmame 0.90-1 (using
..../archives/xmame_0.92-1_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement xmame ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/xmame_0.92-1_all.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man6/xmame.6.gz', which is
also in package xmame-common
dpkg: regarding .../xmame-x_0.92-1_i386.deb containing xmame-x:
xmame-x conflicts with xmame (<< 0.92)
xmame (version 0.90-1) is installed.
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/xmame-x_0.92-1_i386.deb (--unpack):
conflicting packages - not installing xmame-x
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/xmame_0.92-1_all.deb
/var/cache/apt/archives/xmame-x_0.92-1_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-386
Locale: LANG=es_AR, LC_CTYPE=es_AR (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages xmame depends on:
pn xmame-x | xmame-svga | xmame- Not found.
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 296968-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Feb 2005 04:28:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 25 20:28:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dragon.cintegral.cl (cintegral.cl) [200.29.137.130] (qmailr)
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4tYf-00030F-00; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 20:28:01 -0800
Received: (qmail 21771 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2005 04:29:08 -0000
Received: from pc-29-107-86-200.cm.vtr.net (200.86.107.29)
by dragon.cintegral.cl with SMTP; 26 Feb 2005 04:29:08 -0000
Subject:
From: "Bruno Barrera C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-smG11g16DM97EBMVjxEM"
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 01:30:41 -0300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,NOSUBJECT
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--=-smG11g16DM97EBMVjxEM
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I really don't know if this comes from the future or something like that
since I don't remember to have released the 0.92 package.
Probably who made that package is installing the manpage in the xmame-x
package, so obviously it will break my package.
Anyway, I'm currently uploading a new version of xmame today.
--=20
Bruno Barrera C.
Debian Developer
--=-smG11g16DM97EBMVjxEM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBCH/twf+2upy2F5boRAlahAKCh+fCrPMpbUCwCT0wzr2JKi4E91gCgiQWa
aBvURJM/qQSxMQs/YnJ19qI=
=tVSm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-smG11g16DM97EBMVjxEM--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
