Your message dated Sat, 26 Feb 2005 15:14:16 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#296116: udev: upgrade via apt-get: unable to delete old
file
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Feb 2005 11:36:14 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 20 03:36:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtpout18.mailhost.ntl.com (mta10-winn.mailhost.ntl.com)
[212.250.162.18]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D2pNl-00075A-00; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 03:36:13 -0800
Received: from aamta02-winn.mailhost.ntl.com ([212.250.162.8])
by mta10-winn.mailhost.ntl.com with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 11:35:42 +0000
Received: from gpk.wftp.org ([62.254.145.79])
by aamta02-winn.mailhost.ntl.com with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 11:35:41 +0000
Received: from gpk by gpk.wftp.org with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1D2pN1-0006AE-J0; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 11:35:27 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Greg Kochanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: udev: upgrade via apt-get: unable to delete old file
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 11:35:27 +0000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: udev
Version: 0.053-1
Severity: minor
When upgrading udev, I see the following warning:
Unpacking replacement udev ...
dpkg: warning - unable to delete old file `/etc/udev/permissions.d': Directory
not empty
$ ls -l /etc/udev/permissions.d
total 4
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2669 Jan 2 09:41 udev.permissions
$
To the best of my knowledge, I never modified that file, and hadn't even
installed udev on Jan 2 (installation was in late Jan, after Jan 12).
Thus, the file is presumably an unmodified part of the udev package,
and shouldn't be complained about.
-- Package-specific info:
-- /etc/udev/rules.d/:
/etc/udev/rules.d/:
total 0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Jan 29 23:10 cd-aliases.rules -> ../cd-aliases.rules
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Jan 29 23:10 udev.rules -> ../udev.rules
-- /sys/:
/sys/block/fd0/dev
/sys/block/hda/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda1/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda2/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda3/dev
/sys/block/ram0/dev
/sys/block/ram1/dev
/sys/block/ram10/dev
/sys/block/ram11/dev
/sys/block/ram12/dev
/sys/block/ram13/dev
/sys/block/ram14/dev
/sys/block/ram15/dev
/sys/block/ram2/dev
/sys/block/ram3/dev
/sys/block/ram4/dev
/sys/block/ram5/dev
/sys/block/ram6/dev
/sys/block/ram7/dev
/sys/block/ram8/dev
/sys/block/ram9/dev
/sys/class/input/event0/dev
/sys/class/input/event1/dev
/sys/class/input/event2/dev
/sys/class/input/mice/dev
/sys/class/input/mouse0/dev
/sys/class/input/ts0/dev
/sys/class/misc/agpgart/dev
/sys/class/misc/device-mapper/dev
/sys/class/misc/hw_random/dev
/sys/class/misc/psaux/dev
/sys/class/misc/rtc/dev
/sys/class/sound/adsp/dev
/sys/class/sound/audio/dev
/sys/class/sound/controlC0/dev
/sys/class/sound/dsp/dev
/sys/class/sound/dspW/dev
/sys/class/sound/mixer/dev
/sys/class/sound/pcmC0D0c/dev
/sys/class/sound/pcmC0D0p/dev
/sys/class/sound/pcmC0D1p/dev
/sys/class/sound/pcmC0D2c/dev
/sys/class/sound/pcmC0D2p/dev
/sys/class/sound/sequencer/dev
/sys/class/sound/sequencer2/dev
/sys/class/sound/timer/dev
-- Kernel configuration:
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages udev depends on:
ii hotplug 0.0.20040329-16 Linux Hotplug Scripts
ii initscripts 2.86.ds1-1 Standard scripts needed for bootin
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii makedev 2.3.1-75 Creates device files in /dev
ii sed 4.1.2-8 The GNU sed stream editor
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 296116-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Feb 2005 14:14:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 26 06:14:25 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from attila.bofh.it [213.92.8.2] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D52i9-0003ol-00; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 06:14:25 -0800
Received: by attila.bofh.it (Postfix, from userid 10)
id D2AEB5F95D; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 15:14:23 +0100 (CET)
Received: by wonderland.linux.it (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id 4C8441C2A9; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 15:14:16 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 15:14:16 +0100
To: Greg Kochanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#296116: udev: upgrade via apt-get: unable to delete old file
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Feb 20, Greg Kochanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To the best of my knowledge, I never modified that file, and hadn't even
But looks like you did, because udev.permissions is a plain conffile and
it would have been deleted by dpkg as usual if it had not been modified.
(No, the udev package does not modify it.)
--=20
ciao,
Marco
--YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCIIQ4FGfw2OHuP7ERAuAeAJ4yFzKQoaknCTlYI6BdvNKNd0cfKQCfTd7y
axl7+oDC7aBqBwyaaIRo+kU=
=wTtr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
