Your message dated Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:17:15 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#296364: fixed in hdparm 5.9-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Feb 2005 00:39:36 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 21 16:39:36 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from netblock-66-159-231-38.dslextreme.com (mail.cavein.org)
[66.159.231.38]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D3O5P-0001Vs-00; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 16:39:36 -0800
Received: from ultima-thule.cavein.org (IDENT:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
(authenticated bits=128)
by mail.cavein.org (8.13.4.Alpha0/8.13.4.Alpha0/Debian-0) with ESMTP id
j1M0dZln004748
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 00:39:35 GMT
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by ultima-thule.cavein.org (8.13.4.Alpha0/8.13.4.Alpha0/Submit) id
j1M0dYhf004747;
Tue, 22 Feb 2005 00:39:34 GMT
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Richard A Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: hdparm: Recent changes (two level startup) breaks existing setups
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 16:39:34 -0800
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 192.168.1.2
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: hdparm
Version: 5.9-2
Severity: important
After recent changes, I noticed a performance loss - traceable to
the ROOTFS updates.
With these changes, everyone with more than one disk is required to
create a symlink - or only the boot devices gets altered.
It doesn't look difficult to bypass the ROOTFS checking (and subsequent
continues) if [-z "$ROOTFS"]
If that is done, I can have hdparm setup all my ide drives, and those
who want a split setup can define ROOTFS non-null and create their link.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-mm1
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages hdparm depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 296364-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Feb 2005 15:23:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 27 07:23:24 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D5QGS-00054l-00; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 07:23:24 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D5QAV-00034H-00; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:17:15 -0500
From: Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#296364: fixed in hdparm 5.9-3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:17:15 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: hdparm
Source-Version: 5.9-3
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
hdparm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
hdparm-udeb_5.9-3_i386.udeb
to pool/main/h/hdparm/hdparm-udeb_5.9-3_i386.udeb
hdparm_5.9-3.diff.gz
to pool/main/h/hdparm/hdparm_5.9-3.diff.gz
hdparm_5.9-3.dsc
to pool/main/h/hdparm/hdparm_5.9-3.dsc
hdparm_5.9-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/h/hdparm/hdparm_5.9-3_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated hdparm package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:11:40 -0500
Source: hdparm
Binary: hdparm hdparm-udeb
Architecture: source i386
Version: 5.9-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
hdparm - tune hard disk parameters for high performance
hdparm-udeb - tune hard disk parameters for high performance (udeb)
Closes: 296364
Changes:
hdparm (5.9-3) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Don't skip drives in hdparm.init if $ROOTFS is unset (closes: #296364)
Files:
0f37ca9afb851df5b70e788ebd1d5ffe 576 admin optional hdparm_5.9-3.dsc
e015203d839ff896fdff1cf4948080d5 9765 admin optional hdparm_5.9-3.diff.gz
8f2195303a5db6adf2fbe127855acf7e 47820 admin optional hdparm_5.9-3_i386.deb
7b14774a3999c13f5ad7316535080962 21882 debian-installer optional
hdparm-udeb_5.9-3_i386.udeb
package-type: udeb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCIeCySYIMHOpZA44RAhJIAKCPj9OchlkFfzyobKdttNHyFheFHQCg1+jG
apExP3tdgt5lRHVVteQs62E=
=pMtB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
