Your message dated Tue, 01 Mar 2005 11:47:28 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Nov 2002 22:52:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 08 16:52:18 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from diamond.madduck.net [66.92.234.132]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18AHz8-0001mX-00; Fri, 08 Nov 2002 16:52:18 -0600
Received: from localhost (diamond.madduck.net [127.0.0.1])
by diamond.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id 7E81D1101F
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 17:51:47 -0500 (EST)
Received: from fishbowl.madduck.net (d224.palmer.swarthmore.edu
[130.58.226.224])
(using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
(Client CN "fishbowl.madduck.net", Issuer "madduck.net CA" (verified
OK))
by diamond.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id 8E9D411011
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 17:51:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: by fishbowl.madduck.net (postfix, from userid 1000)
id 1AAEE1AC81; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 17:51:38 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 17:51:38 -0500
From: martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: signing-party: should not send to revoked keys
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50
Organization: Debian GNU/Linux
X-OS: Debian GNU/Linux testing/unstable kernel 2.4.19-grsec+freeswan-fishbowl
i686
X-Motto: Keep the good times rollin'
X-Subliminal-Message: debian/rules!
X-Virus-Scanned: on diamond.madduck.net by AMaViS new-20020517
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.2 required=5.0
tests=NOSPAM_INC,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
--ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: signing-party
Version: 0.2.2-1
Severity: minor
gpg-mailkeys should honour revoked keys and not send mail off to them.
in general, is it really necessary to have gpg-mailkeys send to every
single UID in the key? just the main UID would suffice, would it not?
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux fishbowl 2.4.19-grsec+freeswan-fishbowl #1 Wed Oct 30 22:24:5=
3 CET 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=3Den_GB.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=3Dde_DE.ISO-8859-15
Versions of packages signing-party depends on:
ii gnupg 1.2.0-1 GNU privacy guard - a free PGP=
rep
--=20
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
--ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9zD/6IgvIgzMMSnURAnymAKDOjILl6/ngdj9FOQWZUY/CIm090gCePaYw
h4LG/wcEXx7z0aG2X+29HV4=
=jAVN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 168363-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Mar 2005 10:48:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 01 02:48:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from coltrane.azu.nl [143.121.16.65]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D64v2-0006b8-00; Tue, 01 Mar 2005 02:48:01 -0800
Received: from isiwww.rrn.azu.nl (unknown [143.121.62.57])
by coltrane.azu.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58ADD5AC11
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 11:47:30 +0100 (MET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (zoltrix.rrn.azu.nl [143.121.153.52])
by isiwww.rrn.azu.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6222B1B82A
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 11:48:34 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 11:47:28 +0100
From: Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: University Medical Center, Utrecht NL
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug fixed
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.1.1
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="------------enig15BF323218E571A186A6480E"
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig15BF323218E571A186A6480E
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hello,
This bug was already fixed in a previous version of signing-party but
not noted in the changelog.
Thanks for reporting!
Thijs Kinkhorst
--------------enig15BF323218E571A186A6480E
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCJEhAJdKMxZV9WM8RApJZAJsHLM+SYqXDumSa33V1A8yMShzTnwCffiOO
/IjEr11BNy7MdfQmy9r62Bw=
=Yzbs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enig15BF323218E571A186A6480E--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
