Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 23:17:07 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#286688: fixed in kismet 2005.01.R1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Dec 2004 14:55:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 21 06:55:12 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mxout.hispeed.ch (smtp.hispeed.ch) [62.2.95.247] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CglPr-0000MY-00; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 06:55:11 -0800
Received: from holly.subnetz.org (217-162-27-135.dclient.hispeed.ch 
[217.162.27.135])
        by smtp.hispeed.ch (8.12.6/8.12.6/tornado-1.0) with ESMTP id 
iBLEt9Fx027213
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 15:55:10 +0100
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
        by holly.subnetz.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D11972098EA7;
        Tue, 21 Dec 2004 15:55:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: from holly.subnetz.org ([127.0.0.1])
        by localhost (holly [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
        id 29800-04-2; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 15:55:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (mother.subnetz.org [192.168.5.3])
        by holly.subnetz.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F522098EA4;
        Tue, 21 Dec 2004 15:55:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id C6CEF9F30A; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 15:55:08 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Tilman Koschnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: kismet: Please suggest gpsd package
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 15:55:08 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at subnetz.org
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: kismet
Version: 2004.04.R1-5
Severity: wishlist

Hi,

would it be possible to suggest the gpsd package for kismet? gpsdrive
will stop to include /usr/bin/gpsd, and suggest gpsd itself.

Cheers, Til

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 286688-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Mar 2005 04:23:13 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 06 20:23:13 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1D89lx-0002cq-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 20:23:13 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1D89g3-0002LE-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 23:17:07 -0500
From: Francois Gurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#286688: fixed in kismet 2005.01.R1-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 23:17:07 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5

Source: kismet
Source-Version: 2005.01.R1-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
kismet, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

kismet_2005.01.R1-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/k/kismet/kismet_2005.01.R1-2.diff.gz
kismet_2005.01.R1-2.dsc
  to pool/main/k/kismet/kismet_2005.01.R1-2.dsc
kismet_2005.01.R1-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/kismet/kismet_2005.01.R1-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Francois Gurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated kismet package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun,  6 Mar 2005 21:55:50 -0500
Source: kismet
Binary: kismet
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2005.01.R1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Francois Gurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Francois Gurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 kismet     - Wireless 802.11b monitoring tool
Closes: 275182 278519 278520 278666 286688 288035 288035 292685 293362 293567
Changes: 
 kismet (2005.01.R1-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * fix kismet conf man page (closes: #293567)
   * fixed maintainer field which made previous upload an nmu (closes: #293362, 
#278666, #288035, #288035, #278519, #275182, #292685, #278520, #286688)
Files: 
 a6a4ba29220b9b9cadd321f49b734a54 738 net optional kismet_2005.01.R1-2.dsc
 67ea181e8bd57cc49c0b0344de252348 15753 net optional kismet_2005.01.R1-2.diff.gz
 7917a5101d76daeaf6d2957814a656ba 994408 net optional 
kismet_2005.01.R1-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCK846PT5zXYNGejQRAuJSAJ4tjzEsDK/EW4A8x//QeMcwiBWOmACgk71U
2SzBtG0EDcCV73by9+VOXxI=
=17ep
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to