Your message dated Sat, 12 Mar 2005 11:47:13 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#286219: fixed in dosfstools 2.11-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Dec 2004 14:54:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 18 06:54:55 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from simons.xs4all.nl (fire.luon.net) [80.126.201.244] (postfix)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Cffyx-0000pO-00; Sat, 18 Dec 2004 06:54:55 -0800
Received: from spring.luon.net (spring-wired.ipv6.luon.net 
[IPv6:2001:888:1d84:0:20a:95ff:fed1:4834])
        by fire.luon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E95259;
        Sat, 18 Dec 2004 15:54:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: by spring.luon.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 7818D37BAC; Sat, 18 Dec 2004 15:54:44 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Sjoerd Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: mkfs.vfat doesn't work on dm-crypt devices
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.4
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 15:54:44 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: dosfstools
Version: 2.10-1
Severity: normal

Hi,

  When trying to create a vfat filesystem on a dm-crypt dm device one gets the
  following error message:
    # mkfs.vfat /dev/dm-0 
    mkfs.vfat 2.10 (22 Sep 2003)
    mkfs.vfat: unable to get drive geometry for '/dev/dm-0'

  Sjoerd
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-spring
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages dosfstools depends on:
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-19 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 286219-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Mar 2005 16:53:13 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 12 08:53:13 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DA9rV-0003NV-00; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 08:53:13 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DA9lh-0004Fn-00; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 11:47:13 -0500
From: Roman Hodek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#286219: fixed in dosfstools 2.11-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 11:47:13 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: dosfstools
Source-Version: 2.11-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dosfstools, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

dosfstools_2.11-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/d/dosfstools/dosfstools_2.11-1.diff.gz
dosfstools_2.11-1.dsc
  to pool/main/d/dosfstools/dosfstools_2.11-1.dsc
dosfstools_2.11-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/dosfstools/dosfstools_2.11-1_i386.deb
dosfstools_2.11.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/d/dosfstools/dosfstools_2.11.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Roman Hodek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated dosfstools package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 17:19:27 +0100
Source: dosfstools
Binary: dosfstools
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.11-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Roman Hodek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Roman Hodek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 dosfstools - Utilities to create and check MS-DOS FAT filesystems
Closes: 128800 214656 232482 258402 266254 270023 276834 286219 293394 294177 
295181
Changes: 
 dosfstools (2.11-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream version (Closes: #293394, #295181, #294177, #270023, #258402,
     #232482, #214656, #286219, #276834, #266254, #128800)
Files: 
 b51228680e025ab0d210fa141c48986d 554 otherosfs optional dosfstools_2.11-1.dsc
 407d405ade410f7597d364ab5dc8c9f6 68346 otherosfs optional 
dosfstools_2.11.orig.tar.gz
 58097801575430f37a0d061f2d1da0cb 8115 otherosfs optional 
dosfstools_2.11-1.diff.gz
 de3ea385d553ee4ff2b729c3dc85cdf3 52304 otherosfs optional 
dosfstools_2.11-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCMxpRcS3JWD3FdvcRApOHAJoCpvD37AnlhFdA/Kp/8viLVJ2htACdGkU6
uO1YIALpWGkGtHxMjg7HXRc=
=NwR1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to